Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yaxley-Lennon has various convictions. Some of these including for libel against specific muslim children; some for contempt of court interfering with the fairness of trials thus risking the release of people who were ultimately convicted; and some where his libel lead to his supporters committing violence against muslims. (Keeping the [num]s in the quotations, those are the only citations that really matter). On 10…
> libel against specific muslim children One child. Jamal Hijazi. > Regarding his libel that harmed a child The interview with the girl Jamal Hijazi hit in her spine with a hockey stick starts at 21:49, and is followed by discussions with staff at the school, a student he spat at, other staff discussing him knocking a kid out by throwing him against a wall, school records of him bringing a knife and screwdriver to sc…
To quote the video description:
“Silenced” is a documentary that was originally made by Tommy Robinson."
That is the "evidence" you bring?
I wouldn't even trust that any video meeting this description accurately represents the views of someone who is literally filmed speaking in it.
To quote another source:
But the founder of the English Defence League has been told he will face legal action after reposting a screenshot of a message from a mother claiming the youngster had bullied her daughter.
The mother later posted a message on Robinson’s page denying it was Jamal who had attacked her daughter.
> Good. Why aren’t you?
The assorted list of crimes I just gave you, some of which threatened to set some rapists free without conviction.
Also some others I didn't mention, like libelling a journalist's partner by calling them a paedophile, something he later admitted was false. The journalist got this treatment from him after she had asked for his comment for a story she was writing about allegations that he had misused financial donations from his supporters. You know, silencing journalism, just like he accused the judicial system of doing, except he admitted using dishonesty to try to get silence, and was also seen to be dishonest with the libellous statements.
Anyway, here's what he and his former associates have to say on the matter of misused donations: https://web.archive.org/web/20210317214553/https://www.indep...
Lots of examples of him being less than honest — mortgage fraud, using someone else's passport, listing "Ireland" on his Irish passport — so why do you trust his take on anything?