Earlier quoted context omitted.
> contributors of free software tend to be power users or, simply put, nerds it takes both a different background, approach and skillset to design ux and interface if anything FOSS should figure out how to attract skilled artists so majority of designs and logos doesn't look so blatantly amateurish.
I have been beating this drum for many years. There are some big cultural rifts and workflow difficulties. Unless FOSS products are run by project managers rather than either developers or designers, it’s a tough nut. Last I looked, gimp has been really tackling this effort more aggressively than most.
Free software scares normal people
111–120 of 641 posts
Re: Free software scares normal people
#112Re: Free software scares normal people
#113Re: Free software scares normal people
#114Good article, but the reasoning is wrong. It isn't easy to make a simple interface in the same way that Pascal apologized for writing a long letter because he didn't have time to write a shorter one. Implementing the UI for one exact use case is not much trouble, but figuring out what that use case is difficult. And defending that use case from the line of people who want "that + this little extra thing", or the "I j…
I do feel quite strongly that this should be implemented in the app though.
There must be examples of this approach already being used?
Re: Free software scares normal people
#115Re: Free software scares normal people
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you only care about converting media without tweaking anything, ffmpeg offers the simplest UI ever. ffmpeg -i input.avi output.mp4
Proposing a CLI command as a candidate for "simplest UI ever" is a great gag.
Re: Free software scares normal people
#117Banks. Won't touch any free software, unless backed by some real humans signing huge contracts for support.
Re: Free software scares normal people
#118Re: Free software scares normal people
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
The contributors of free software tend to be power users who want to ensure their use case works. I don't think they're investing a lot of thought into the 80/20 use case for normal/majority or users or would risk hurting their workflow to make it easier for others
> contributors of free software tend to be power users or, simply put, nerds it takes both a different background, approach and skillset to design ux and interface if anything FOSS should figure out how to attract skilled artists so majority of designs and logos doesn't look so blatantly amateurish.
i think the bigger issue is that the power users usecases are different from the non-power users. not a skillset problem, but an incentive one
Re: Free software scares normal people
#120A lot of this type of stuff boils down to what you're used to. My wife is not particularly tech savvy. She is a Linux user, however. When we started a new business, we needed certain applications that only run on Windows and since she would be at the brick and mortar location full time, I figured we could multi-purpose a new laptop for her and have her switch to Windows. She hated it and begged for us to get a dedica…
My mom had no trouble adjusting to it. It was all just computer to her in some ways.