Grokipedia and the coup against reality
41–50 of 214 posts
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#42people on the autism spectrum are amazingly good at what they're good at and spectacularly bad at what they're bad at. I wish Musk would just stick to what he's good at like SpaceX and Tesla etc.
As an ex Tesla owner, I am amused by the idea that anyone thinks that Musk was "good" at running Tesla. Those cars are cheaply and shoddily made, and have probably the worst service experience in the industry. It's my understanding that Musk has only minimal influence on SpaceX. Edit: I would like to repeat the point that I owned one, for four years, during which it had to go in for service 12 times, four of which we…
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#43people on the autism spectrum are amazingly good at what they're good at and spectacularly bad at what they're bad at. I wish Musk would just stick to what he's good at like SpaceX and Tesla etc.
It's probably drugs. Before Musk announced he was a druggie, he had a good track record. Since then, it's been weird.
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#44[flagged]
No-one is going to accept your "challenge".
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Neutrality means reporting the truth, it doesn't mean reporting in between both sides.
The submission is titled "Grokipedia by xAI has just launched with 885,279 articles" and is just a direct link to Grokipedia. It is quite literally the most neutral, non-editorialized submission to HN.
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is he even good at rockets and cars or is he just good at hyping them up and attracting funding?
Even if he was not involved in engineering whatsoever, his ability to attract talent, direct capital, and drive innovation is unmatched.
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#47Perhaps if Wikipedia hadn't drifted so far left (on culture war topics, it's fine for science etc), then maybe it wouldn't have been necessary.
https://manhattan.institute/article/is-wikipedia-politically...
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#48This is bad but if you think Wikipedia was accurately describing reality than you should go read the wikipedia article on "Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect"
The article isn't claiming Wikipedia is perfect - it argues that Grokipedia is intentionally deceptive. There’s a difference between flawed and weaponized.
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
The submission is titled "Grokipedia by xAI has just launched with 885,279 articles" and is just a direct link to Grokipedia. It is quite literally the most neutral, non-editorialized submission to HN.
Should be a ShowHN. There is nothing to discuss by just linking the startpage otherwise. An article like this can be discussed...
Re: Grokipedia and the coup against reality
#50[flagged]