I would have written "lexical fruit machine", for its left to right sequential ejaculation of tokens, and its amusingly antiquated homophobic criminological implication.
It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
21–30 of 565 posts
Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#22Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#23You're telling me I need to use 100% of my brain, reasoning power, and time to go over your code, but you didn't feel the need to hold yourself to the same standard?
Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#24Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#25But just say it! Bypass the middleman who's just going to make it blurrier or more long-winded.
Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#26It's insulting but I also find it extremely concerning that my younger colleagues can't seem to tell the difference. An article will very clearly be AI slop and I'll express frustration, only to discover that they have no idea what I"m talking about.
Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#27Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#28Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#29Anyone who has done any serious writing knows that a good editor will always find a dozen or more errors in any essay of reasonable length, and very few people are willing to pay for professional proofreading services on blog posts. On the other side of the coin, readers will wince and stumble over such errors; they will not wonder at the artisanal authenticity of your post, but merely be annoyed. Wabi-sabi is an aesthetic best reserved for decor, not prose.
Re: It's insulting to read AI-generated blog posts
#30If they can’t be bothered to write it, why should I be bothered to read it?