Live data from Hacker News

US axes website for reporting human rights abuses by US-armed foreign forces

bbc.com

451–453 of 453 posts

Re: US axes website for reporting human rights abuses by US-armed foreign forces

#451
post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it really longer than the Catholic church?

Along this line of thinking, surely there’s an unbroken administrative / bureaucratic tradition running China that spans multiple royal dynasties and perhaps even the recent ideological upheaval. Can we call that an enduring government?

I don't think there is, since China's last dynasty ended in 1912. At that point, and in 1947, there were very clear breaks with previous governance

Re: US axes website for reporting human rights abuses by US-armed foreign forces

#452

It sounds like this was mainly being used to report abuses by US allies, ie “US armed IDF forces” according to the article. Obviously there is something more to this than the headline and tone of the piece indicate. For one thing, the law written by Leahy was passed in 2011, but this website went online in 2022, so how can removing the site make it impossible to abide by the law? What was going on between 2011 and 20…

>Obviously there is something more to this than the headline and tone of the piece indicate.

So... what is that something? Did you find out or is the article not actually using the wrong "tone" and is in fact just reporting what happened?

>so how can removing the site make it impossible to abide by the law?

Did you find what the replacement for this service is? Has the government actually provided one? Did you read the law?

Re: US axes website for reporting human rights abuses by US-armed foreign forces

#453
post #64

This seems like a bad decision to me. Not only does it seem not to be in the spirit of the law (you can still report but not as easily now) but it's not clear why they shut it down at all. Cost? Inefficiency? Just wasn't getting used much? They have a better solution? On the other hand, the US seems so partisan now that had the current administration told the world they were taking huma' rights abuse reporting seriou…

Hegseth is publicly just a huge fan of war crimes and this is probably the main reason he got the job he has now. The big thing he's been signaling, and not really even in a sly or dogwhistly way, is that war crimes are ok to do now. If your goal is to do war crimes and enable others to do war crimes then removing the war crime reporting tool may not directly benefit you much but it certainly doesn't hurt you. And th…

> The big thing he's been signaling, and not really even in a sly or dogwhistly way, is that war crimes are ok to do now

Can you give examples? In your own words? Without linking to another website?

Post reply on HN