GenAI Image Editing Showdown

Post by RobotToaster » Sun, Oct 26, 2025, 5:13 PM UTC

thinkingtoilet wrote: post #39

greatgib wrote: post #23

Gpt4o shows the huge annoyance of the company/model being a moral judge of your requests and refusing quite often for anything negative. It's like 1964 but corporate enforced. Now there are tasks that you are not allowed to do despite being legal. In the same way, using gpt5 is now very unbearable to me as it almost always starts all responses of a conversation by things like: "Great question", "good observation wort…

Name me one piece of enterprise software that lets you do NSFW things. The way people jump to 1984 with no thought is double plus bad. ChatGPT is a piece of enterprise software. They are trying to sell it to large companies at large prices. This is not a rhetorical question, do you think if you could generate nude images of celebrities or picture of extreme violence, corporations would buy it? Having been a director…

Post by fart-fart-FART » Sun, Oct 26, 2025, 5:23 PM UTC

Lerc wrote: post #29

ACCount37 wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People gave Altman shit for enabling NSFW in ChatGPT, but I see that as a step in the right direction. The right direction being: the one that leads to less corporate censorship. >In the same way, using gpt5 is now very unbearable to me as it almost always starts all responses of a conversation by things like: "Great question" User preference data is toxic. Doing RLHF on it gives LLM sycophancy brainrot. And by now,…

I have seen a few normally progressive types act quite conservative puritan over the NSFW ChatGPT thing. It seems there are quite a lot of people consider things to be uniformly good or bad and their opinion of the whole colours their opinion of the parts. OpenAI are in a difficult position when it comes to global standards. It's probably easier to see from outside of the United States, because the degree to which th…

Post by [deleted] » Sun, Oct 26, 2025, 5:54 PM UTC

drdeca wrote: post #42

thinkingtoilet wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Name me one piece of enterprise software that lets you do NSFW things. The way people jump to 1984 with no thought is double plus bad. ChatGPT is a piece of enterprise software. They are trying to sell it to large companies at large prices. This is not a rhetorical question, do you think if you could generate nude images of celebrities or picture of extreme violence, corporations would buy it? Having been a director…

Technically? Microsoft Word certainly lets one write smut, and Photoshop certainly allows one to draw pornography? They won’t like, produce NSFW things automatically of course.

Post by ryandrake » Sun, Oct 26, 2025, 6:30 PM UTC

drdeca wrote: post #42

thinkingtoilet wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Name me one piece of enterprise software that lets you do NSFW things. The way people jump to 1984 with no thought is double plus bad. ChatGPT is a piece of enterprise software. They are trying to sell it to large companies at large prices. This is not a rhetorical question, do you think if you could generate nude images of celebrities or picture of extreme violence, corporations would buy it? Having been a director…

Technically? Microsoft Word certainly lets one write smut, and Photoshop certainly allows one to draw pornography? They won’t like, produce NSFW things automatically of course.

Post by echelon » Sun, Oct 26, 2025, 10:53 PM UTC

fart-fart-FART wrote: post #44

echelon wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This would be easy to patch the models to fix. Just gather a small amount of training data for these cases, eg. "change the clock hands to 5:30" with the corresponding edit. Three tuple: (original image, text edit instruction, final image). Easy to patch for editing models, anyway. Maybe not text to image models.

waste of money and effort, imo. there are +- infinity of such small things to fix.