Live data from Hacker News

A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

nrc.gov

351–360 of 545 posts

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#351
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that reactor and waste pools are some of the least radioactive environments as they are constantly monitored for leakage.

Possibly, but I wouldn't think "least radioactive environments in a nuclear reactor" is a low bar. I don't know, though.

It’s an incredibly high bar. Most places in a reactor are required by law to have lower radiation levels than you’d be exposed to standing outside in Denver.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#352
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that reactor and waste pools are some of the least radioactive environments as they are constantly monitored for leakage.

Possibly, but I wouldn't think "least radioactive environments in a nuclear reactor" is a low bar. I don't know, though.

It sure shouldn't be a low bar! People have to work there all day.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#353
post #246
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

dunno if the life vest bit comment of yours was sarcastic, but it is a funny remark for sure :-) it sounds like "guy felt down in a volcano, but fortunately, he had a life vest"

My understanding is that reactor and waste pools are some of the least radioactive environments as they are constantly monitored for leakage.

Also, it is fully demineralised water to avoid neutron capture.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#354
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

dunno if the life vest bit comment of yours was sarcastic, but it is a funny remark for sure :-) it sounds like "guy felt down in a volcano, but fortunately, he had a life vest"

Wow, people are really clueless about how nuclear power plants really work. It's really not that dangerous to fall into the water.

Might be. If the reactor was recently defueled, especially, might there be more junk floating in the water?

If said junk was alpha- or beta-emitting, it could be enough of a danger for cancer.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#356
post #246
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

dunno if the life vest bit comment of yours was sarcastic, but it is a funny remark for sure :-) it sounds like "guy felt down in a volcano, but fortunately, he had a life vest"

My understanding is that reactor and waste pools are some of the least radioactive environments as they are constantly monitored for leakage.

I'm pretty sure the engineer at the nuclear plant I visited in elementary school drank a glass of water out of that pool to demonstrate how safe it was.

I hope I'm misremembering that but it's a pretty strong memory that totally locked in for me that that water is not necessarily dangerous.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#357
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that reactor and waste pools are some of the least radioactive environments as they are constantly monitored for leakage.

Also, it is fully demineralised water to avoid neutron capture.

Well it’s not demineralised anymore since someone fell into it. I wonder if they have to replace the water now.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#358
post #346
post #338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey, no need to be condescending. Some people just haven't read [the xkcd.]( https://what-if.xkcd.com/29/ )

Life vest suddenly seems very relevant.

Just make sure the life vest is made of kevlar.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#359
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, people are really clueless about how nuclear power plants really work. It's really not that dangerous to fall into the water.

The zeitgeist has been anti-nuclear for so many decades, fear pops up around any topic that's at all adjacent to a reactor.

Or maybe people just don’t that water mitigates radiation really well? You can be very pro-nuclear and still be concerned about radioactive contamination if you don’t know that radioactivity is dramatically reduced by just a few feet of water.

Re: A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool

#360

Why didn't they shave off the hair and measure again before sending off to medical? They have the opportunity to report lower numbers, and would enable identifying non-hair-adsorbed radiatioactive matter on the subject. It sounds so easy and actionable it boggles the mind that it's not part of the protocol.

I thought this as well but given some other comments the measures numbers are open to interpretation/ spread. Also it could be considered a violation of the person's body if done without his consent.

and one could argue that showering without consent is also a violation of the person's body... consider an accident where a person is actually super hot with radioactive contamination, does the person have the right to exit the facility without shower and spread the radioactive particulates at will?

the thing is that this type of "violation" can easily be prevented by including the obligatory showering or shaving as part of the contract, so either they consent or they didn't end up in a position where they can be exposed to radioactive matter.

So this can not explain why the hair wasn't shaved.

Post reply on HN