Is there a web page to browse all these fonts? That dropdown is tedious to use.
Prepare for some resource hogging :)
41–50 of 86 posts
Is there a web page to browse all these fonts? That dropdown is tedious to use.
Prepare for some resource hogging :)
Neat, but I don't understand why Adobe would do this. I already use Adobe Typekit, and $50/year gives me access to a huge library of fonts at an unlimited number of websites. For my purposes, I'm tempted to stop paying even that totally reasonable, meager amount and just use this free offering instead. After following most of the links on the page, I can't find any mention of limits on pageviews or traffic. On the su…
Adobe® Edge Web Fonts: Paid for graciously by the users of Typekit.
From a business standpoint, it makes perfect sense to turn fonts into a "service" by hyping the hosting aspect. It would be like if jQuery said you can't serve jquery.js from your web server, you can only link to it, and then they start offering paid versions of jQuery.
I realize fonts are a commercial product, but my understanding is that Google Web Fonts really are free to use in your apps, whereas this is a free service. According to the terms, it is illegal to "retransmit" the "Service Materials".
Priceless! "Our mission: move the web forward and give web designers and developers the best tools and services in the world." And then: "Download a PDF version of this document (PDF, 47 KB)"
You do know that PDF is an open format, right?
Careful, you can't legally serve these fonts with your app, you can only link to them. Am I the only one who finds this a big deal? It means you can't control the uptime of your fonts, and it seems like it would complicate development when you're offline, too. From a business standpoint, it makes perfect sense to turn fonts into a "service" by hyping the hosting aspect. It would be like if jQuery said you can't serve…
The website itself has hardly any frills.