Live data from Hacker News

LLMs can get "brain rot"

llm-brain-rot.github.io

1–10 of 310 posts

Re: LLMs can get "brain rot"

#3

Can someone explain this in laymen terms?

They benchmark two different feeds of dangerous tweets:

  (1) a feed of the most popular tweets based on likes, retweets, and such
  (2) an algorithmic feed that looks for clickbait in the text
and blend these in different proportions to a feed of random tweets that are not popular nor clickbait and find that feed (1) has more of damaging effect on the performance of chatbots. That is, they feed that blend of tweets into the model and then they ask the models to do things and get worse outcomes.

Re: LLMs can get "brain rot"

#4

Can someone explain this in laymen terms?

They benchmark two different feeds of dangerous tweets: (1) a feed of the most popular tweets based on likes, retweets, and such (2) an algorithmic feed that looks for clickbait in the text and blend these in different proportions to a feed of random tweets that are not popular nor clickbait and find that feed (1) has more of damaging effect on the performance of chatbots. That is, they feed that blend of tweets into…

Blended in how? To the training set?

Re: LLMs can get "brain rot"

#10

Isn't this just garbage in garbage out with an attention grabbing title?

Considering that the current state of the art for LLM training is to feed it massive amounts of garbage (with some good stuff alongside), it seems important to point this out even if it might seem obvious.
Post reply on HN