I'm not really sure if keeping a strict schedule has any real relevance here, outside maybe PR and politics. Starships will drop the cost to other bodies in the same way Falcon dropped the cost to orbit. Why would anyone want to invest in a technology and a project that will be obsolete by the time it's implemented?
That is assuming Starship succeeds. Elon's track record hasn't exactly been stellar as of late.
NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
141–150 of 1001 posts
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#142I'm not really sure if keeping a strict schedule has any real relevance here, outside maybe PR and politics. Starships will drop the cost to other bodies in the same way Falcon dropped the cost to orbit. Why would anyone want to invest in a technology and a project that will be obsolete by the time it's implemented?
This work could revolutionise America's manufacturing/industrial base, if there was someone around who could direct the ship in that direction.
I could imagine, given a bit of funding bump, the van-lifers and the earthship folks could find themselves with a life-support-system revolution to participate in .. especially if it were oriented not just towards starship interiors, but life-on-the-streets/in-the-woods/on-mars solutions .. the good ol' USA has tons of test monkeys for that scenario.
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not sure if you're being sarcastic. Have they managed to get to orbit anything bigger than a banana? Yes, about 4,000 metric tons. My IP packets are traveling through part of it now.
On starship?
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know who else can, but I do seriously doubt SpaceX is going to be able to deliver within the next decade or so either.
"Not within the next decade" (e.g. not until 2041) is a long time. The first prototype of Starship only did its first hop in July 2019, so 6 years ago. The first flight integrated test only happened 2,5 years ago. Nowadays they can return to Earth already and catch the booster. Why would you expect the rest of the development to drag until 2041?
I mean don't get me wrong, it's exciting and I'm grateful to be alive for these developments along with all access insight in the process and high definition video of the tests and I really hope they make it. But it won't be fast or cheap.
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#145[flagged]
The ketamine addiction rumors are unproven, and Musk denies them. He says he takes it as prescribed against occasional depression.
No one with his level of wealth should exist as a basic concept.
I submit the policy proposal that anyone who over $1 billion in net worth should lose all constitutional rights. If you are willing to hoard that much wealth for yourself without using it to help others you deserve nothing. You don't even need rights at that point.
Elon Musk's current net worth is about $500 billion. It only costs $40 billion/year to end world hunger. For the entire world. [1]
That's only 8% of his net worth.
He paid more to buy Twitter as a hobby than it would have cost him to end world hunger for a year.
In other words, Elon Musk could single-handedly end world hunger by liquidating his assets and it would be probably not even empty his portfolio, possibly ever if it were well-managed.
You only need $10 million to never work again and live a very generous lifestyle withdrawing at least 5x the US median income for yourself forever until you die, and Elon has hoarded that amount of wealth FIFTY THOUSAND TIMES.
[1] https://www.wfpusa.org/news/how-much-would-it-cost-to-end-wo...
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#146Considering nobody in the world can compete with SpaceX currently this seems purely political in nature. The EU is struggling to even come up with an answer to reusable rockets. China is the closest and will likely have something equivalent to the Falcon 9 within the next 2 years. But someone in the USA? People are delusional. Sure it is always best to have competitors but how did that work for Boeing/NASA/Starliner?…
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#147> Elon Musk, the boss of SpaceX, fired back: "SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words." Still marking his words on self-driving vehicles so I guess we can add this to the list. What’s the casualty count so far on that one btw? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autono...
You need to keep two things in your mind at the same time: Elon Musk sometimes say things that are true. Elon Must sometimes say things that are not true. In this case, it's the first one.
> you need to keep two things in your mind at the same time
This was unnecessary and patronizing.
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#148> Elon Musk, the boss of SpaceX, fired back: "SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words." Still marking his words on self-driving vehicles so I guess we can add this to the list. What’s the casualty count so far on that one btw? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autono...
That's a fun list, but it feels like an odd thing to have its own article on Wikipedia.
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Not within the next decade" (e.g. not until 2041) is a long time. The first prototype of Starship only did its first hop in July 2019, so 6 years ago. The first flight integrated test only happened 2,5 years ago. Nowadays they can return to Earth already and catch the booster. Why would you expect the rest of the development to drag until 2041?
Well that's just the empty booster; what they plan to do next with v3 is refueling in space, but what I haven't heard anything about yet is landing on the moon, crew compartiments, cargo, and launching again. Any one of those is years of development and testing. I mean don't get me wrong, it's exciting and I'm grateful to be alive for these developments along with all access insight in the process and high definition…
Something can be copied from Dragon, but not all of those.
Re: NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission
#150A full-flow staged combustion engine, which proven works (yay) most of the time (not yay). If you follow the Starship launches, look at the random engines that go out on the Super Heavy every time it launches. The engines going out during ascent aren't planned outages.
A rapidly re-usable second stage. This is by far the most challenging part of the program. It turns out, returning things from space is mad difficult. And while I think it's great that we are investigating ways to make this happen, I'm a bit bearish on whether Starship itself will be the vehicle and team that ultimately figures this out. However, at the very least, there's a ton of science being done here that will ultimately help making this a reality.
Starship isn't returning in any meaningfully reusable form just yet. And while they've figured out how to get the thing up suborbital, there's yet no guarantee on the survivability of the vehicle itself. I am for sure certain that Elon is very likely unhappy with having to use heat shield tiles because they are not reusable. We don't yet know the stresses on the vehicle itself when returning from space and just how reusable the second stage actually is. Nor, for that matter, just how usable the second stage is.
Do I think they'll figure out how to get it to orbit? Of course. Do I think they'll figure out how to make it rapidly reusable? I'm not sure. And we won't yet know for a couple of years.
Getting a payload to LEO as far as rocket launches are concerned is "easy" relative to the loftier goals of the Moon, and by much further extension, Mars. The Moon is significantly harder to pull off and that's why the Saturn V was a 3-stage rocket.
In order to make all of this worth it, Starship and Super Heavy must be rapidly reusable--with a turnaround measured in hours/days, not weeks and months. And I'm just not sure it's there yet. Which really sucks, because getting mass to orbit is critically important for us to dominate our solar system.
I think the research is important, personally. And I'm glad we're investing at least some money into these projects. But there's no way Starship and Super Heavy meet the timelines allocated. But I'm wishing the best for the team to figure out something. And if not them, then some future generation that piggybacks off of the work they did to do it better.