Ripgrep 15.0
github.com
Ripgrep 15.0
1–10 of 119 posts
Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#2Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#3Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#4Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#5Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#6Has it caught up to ugrep in terms of backward compatibility and speed yet?
Aa for ugrep, flipping the question around would be more appropriate. ugrep has caught up with ripgrep in some common cases, but not all.
Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#7Has it caught up to ugrep in terms of backward compatibility and speed yet?
First of all, the ugrep performance comparisons are online (and haven't been updated to compare against this version that was only released 3 days ago). So your question is answerable:
https://github.com/Genivia/ugrep-benchmarks
The two are very close and both are head and shoulders faster than most other options.
And backwards compatibility is a mixed thing, not a mandatory goal. It's admirable that ugrep is trying to be a better drop-in replacement. It's also cool that ripgrep is trying to rethink the interface for improving usability.
(I like ripgrep in part because it has different defaults than grep that work very well for my use cases, which is primarily searching through codebases. The lack of backwards compatibility goes both ways. Will we see a posix ripgrep? Probably not. Is ripgrep a super useful and user-friendly tool? Definitely.)
Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#8Probably the singular reason why I finally use regex as the first search option, rather than turning to it after bruting thru a search with standard wildcards.
Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#9Just like fd, I actually enjoy using rg and like these new set of command line tools.
Re: Ripgrep 15.0
#10Anyway I'm trying to retrain the fingers these days, rg is super cool.