I do think the big story here is how hyperfocused and path-dependent people got on MCP, when the actually-interesting thing is simply "tool calls". Tool calls are incredibly interesting and useful. MCP is just one means to that end, and not one of the better ones.
MCP seems valuable in that it teaches the llm about oauth. So you can do server based tool calls. Before that you had to install each cli you wanted and it would invariably be doing some auth thing under the covers. Took calling was certainly the big llm advantage but “hey tools should probably auth correctly” is pretty valuable.
Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
171–180 of 383 posts
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#172I was considering the merits of a news article analysts skill that processed the content adopting a variety of personas of opinions and degrees of adversarial attitudes in isolated contexts then bought the responses together into a single context to arbitrate the viewpoints impartially.
Or even a skill for "where did this claim originate?". I'd love an auto Snopes skill.
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd be really interested in what you mean. Are the any studies that quantify this difference in model performance when using JSON or XML? What could be a good intuition for why there might be a big difference? If XML is better than JSON for LLMs, why isn't everyone and the grandma recommending me to use XML instead of JSON? Why is Google Gemini API offering structured output only with JSON schema instead of XML schem…
I don't know if the XML is better than JSON thing still holds with this year's frontier models, but it was definitely a thing last year. Here's Anthropic's documentation about that: https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/prompt-eng... Note that they don't actually suggest that the XML needs to be VALID! My guess was that JSON requires more characters to be escaped than XML-ish syntax does, plus matching op…
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#174I've been able to build the equivalent of skills with a few markdown files. I need to remind my agent every so often to use a skill but usually once per session at most. I don't get what's so special about Claude doing this?
Part of it is that they gave a name to a useful pattern that people had already been discovering independently. Names are important, because they mean we can start having higher quality conversations about the pattern. Anthropic also realized that this pattern solves one of the persistent problems with coding agents: context pollution. You need to stuff as little material as possible into the context to enable the to…
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#175I've been able to build the equivalent of skills with a few markdown files. I need to remind my agent every so often to use a skill but usually once per session at most. I don't get what's so special about Claude doing this?
Part of it is that they gave a name to a useful pattern that people had already been discovering independently. Names are important, because they mean we can start having higher quality conversations about the pattern. Anthropic also realized that this pattern solves one of the persistent problems with coding agents: context pollution. You need to stuff as little material as possible into the context to enable the to…
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
> MCP, Apps, Skills, Gems - all this stuff seems to be tackling the wrong problem My fairly negative take on all of this has been that we’re writing more docs, creating more apis and generally doing a lot of work to make the AI work, that would’ve yielded the same results if we did it for people in the first place. Half my life has been spent trying to debug issues in complex systems that do not have those available.
If writing a good document and a strong API had to happen anyway, and now you can write just that and the rest will take care of itself, we may actually have progressed. Plus the documents would then have to be there, instead of skipped like today. The counter-argument is that code is the only way to concisely and unambiguously express how everything should work.
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny thing, pseudo-XML is going through a big resurgence right now, because models love it, while they seriously struggle with JSON.
HTML? Is the main advantage of XML for understandability the labeled closing tags? Lisp has the same struggle too?
Browser engines could've been simpler; web development tools could've been more robust and powerful much earlier; we would be able to rely on XSLT and invent other ways of processing and consuming web content; we would have proper XHTML modules, instead of the half-baked Web Components we have today. Etc.
Instead, we got standards built on poorly specified conventions, and we still have to rely on 3rd-party frameworks to build anything beyond a toy web site.
Stricter web documents wouldn't have fixed all our problems, but they would have certainly made a big impact for the better.
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure why you’re getting downvoted. The marketing that LLM=AI seems to have been interpreted as “_only_ LLM=AI”
I think the difference now is that traditional software ultimately comes down to a long series of if/then statements (also the old AI's like Wolfram), whereas the new AI (mainly LLM's) have a fundamentally different approach.
If you mean that it all breaks down to if/else at some level then, yeah, but that goes for LLMs too. LLMs aren't the quantum leap people seem to think they are.
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
tbh wolfram alpha was the craziest thing ever. haven't done much research on how this was implemented back in the day but to achieve what they did for such complex mathematical problems without AI was kind of nuts
Would really like something selfhosted that does the basic Wolfram Alpha math things. Doesn't need the craziest math capability but standard symbolic math stuff like expression reduction, differentiation and integration of common equations, plotting, unit wrangling. All with an easy to use text interface that doesn't require learning.
https://maxima.sourceforge.io/
I used it when it was called Macsyma running on TOPS-20 (and a PDP-10 / Decsystem-20).
Text interface will require a little learning, but not much.
Re: Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is pseudo-XML?
Looks like XML but isn't actually valid XML. This for example: This & that Simon Article content goes here If you ask an LLM for the title, author and body it will give you the right answer, even though that is not a valid XML document.
Just look at HTML vs XHTML.