Live data from Hacker News

Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

dwarkesh.com

11–20 of 1001 posts

Re: Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

#13
post #2

This seems to be the growing consensus.

There is a very strange totally coincidental correlation where if you are smart and NOT trying to raise money for an AI start-up, you think AGI is far away, and if you are smart and actively raising money for an AI start-up, then AGI is right around the corner. One of those odd coincidences of modern life

Re: Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

#14

And self sustained nuclear fusion is 20 years away, perpetually. On which evidence can he affirm a timeline for AGI when we can barely define intelligence?

I'd argue we've had more progress towards fusion than AGI.

Re: Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

#15

And self sustained nuclear fusion is 20 years away, perpetually. On which evidence can he affirm a timeline for AGI when we can barely define intelligence?

And a program that can write, sound and paint like a human was 20 years away perpetually as well, until it wasn't.

Re: Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

#16

Whenever someone brings up "AI", I tell them AI is not real AI. Machine learning is a more apt buzzword. And real AI is probably like fusion. Its always 10 years away.

> Whenever someone brings up "AI", I tell them AI is not real AI.

You and also everyone since the beginning of AI. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2024/06/20/not-ai/

Re: Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

#18

Whenever someone brings up "AI", I tell them AI is not real AI. Machine learning is a more apt buzzword. And real AI is probably like fusion. Its always 10 years away.

AI is in the eye of the beholder.

Re: Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents

#19

And self sustained nuclear fusion is 20 years away, perpetually. On which evidence can he affirm a timeline for AGI when we can barely define intelligence?

I'd argue we've had more progress towards fusion than AGI.

Yet at the same time "towards" does not equate to "nearing". Relative terms for relative statements. Until there's a light at the end of the tunnel, we don't know how far we've got.
Post reply on HN