Live data from Hacker News

Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

twitter.com

61–70 of 80 posts

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#61
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Full quote is this: "The questions posed by AI are open to all of us. And they demand answers. A book that is written to challenge all readers, no matter your worldview, 2084 shows how the Christian worldview, properly understood, can provide evidence–based, credible answers that will bring you real hope for the future of humanity." Does 'the Christian worldview' invalidate any conclusions the authors may present?

Describing the "Christian worldview" as "evidence-based" suggests that a healthy dose of skepticism is warranted when evaluating the authors' conclusions, yes.

'The Christian worldview' is actually evidence-based, it's not based on childish stories of "ghosts" and "angels". Please, read the book first before judging by the cover.

As another reference, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42877709 (https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/docu...)

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#63
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find these takes so odd. Porn is the early adopter of EVERY technology. When non-linear editing software was invented in the 90s by Avid, who was the first industry to use them? It might not be advertised, but it's true. Porn leads the way. lol. This is no different.

This isn't really porn adopting ChatGPT, it's OpenAI allowing porn. There was nothing stopping Pornhub from releasing their own LLM. If porn became a feature gated behind YouTube Premium I would probably say "wow they really need customers huh".

> There was nothing stopping Pornhub from releasing their own LLM

There's probably a lot stopping them considering there's about 3 companies making models that aren't shit.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#65
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh no worries, worst case it will be leaked once you run for office somewhere ;)

What about the people currently in office?

Only few have the liberty to grab some on some tape in Moscow while going into some island by paying of some starlet ...

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#66

Onlyfans models already paying poverty wages for people to pretend to be them in chat. Presumably this will just be part of that offering.

Just wait until the Onlyfans models end in poverty themselves because Sora replaces them (after training on their data).

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#67
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume you will need to do a Blockchain Iris scan from his other company in order to prove your Age and Identity.

----TINFOIL HAT BLOCK START---- That's the idea. For too long people have been able to free-associate and share truth online. Now they finally have a reason to end anonymity online. Due to the raw power of AI there is a very real threat these new tools provide to bad actors in the generation of misinformation and disinformation and now we need to ascertain the providence of all content created online. With "AI" being…

I think this is my fav HN comment ever.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#68

OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?

In general I think it's perfectly fine to have uncensored NSFW chats. The fact that all of the mainstream LLMs are way more restrictive than basic web searches we've had for decades is kind of ridiculous.

In this particular case though I can't imagine it's a good idea to hand Sam Altman and his company chat logs of your explicit fantasies tied to your real identity.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#70

OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?

I don't have issue with NSFW content per se, but this? This isn't a problem of whether NSFW content should exist. It's a much bigger issue than that.

First, mental health issues surrounding this are far from being solved. Having a sycophantic robot faking intimacy looks manipulative, ripe for exploitation, and damaging to long term psychological well-being.

Second, this is a service that manufactures compromising chat logs and stores them for profit. Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?

Post reply on HN