Live data from Hacker News

Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

scottrlarson.com

101–110 of 514 posts

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#101
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ubuntu has unfortunately become the Windows of the Linux world - and I don't mean that in a good way. Unless you want to be the perpetual IT support for your parents, I would recommend getting a user-friendly immutable/atomic distro, like Aurora[1]. Aurora uses KDE, which most Windows users would find familiar. It is immutable, which makes it very hard to break, and it uses atomic updates (basically updates either ap…

The Windows of 15 years ago, maybe. Using Ubuntu now does not feel anywhere near as bad as using current Windows.

You may feel so right now, but wait until it's time to do a dist-upgrade... https://ounapuu.ee/posts/2025/02/05/done-with-ubuntu/

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#102
post #84
post #11

I know this isn't Stackoverflow, but... Does anyone have a good mental model for disentangling the issues of full-disk encryption versus secure-boot? I've been badly procrastinating with my desktop's new SSD because of it. Use-case is: * Dual-boot where I choose in BIOS/UEFI to go to either the existing Win10 drive or new Linux drive. * I don't need unattended boot at all, I'd rather enter a passphrase every time. *…

I second slicktux's suggestion: look into OPAL, it's much more easier to setup and use compared to LUKS. The best part is, the encryption is transparent to the OS, so you could multi-boot between multiple OSes and not worry about encryption or compatibility with partitioning tools etc. Your drive does need to support OPAL though, check out sedcli for managing SEDs.

Microsoft abandoned OPAL/SED support due to vendor's just f-ing it up making the encryption worthless. YMMV.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#103
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Make sure libreoffice is included, and ublock origin. Show them how much faster it is, with fewer ads, and no subscription to Microsoft required just to write a document. The business customers might want to know that databases are a lot cheaper on Linux, especially for small business. Literally spoke to an automation company the other week that told me "we have to delete a bunch of stuff every time the database gets…

I switched from Google Docs to Libre Office a few months ago. I'm surprised how buggy LO is, because I tried it a decade ago and it doesn't seem to have gotten any better. I don't plan on going back to MS or Google, but I am very frustrated with the number of bugs in LO's spreadsheets, so I try to keep my sheets simple and CTRL-S a LOT! Examples: [1] I selected a range of cells recently, by clicking and dragging, and…

I use LO for its word processor fairly extensively and have been pretty happy with it, but for spreadsheets I am 100% on team gnumeric---it is rock solid, less buggy than Excel itself, and supports a lot of Excel formulas and formatting better than MS's own web client.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#104
post #2

I am a IT solutions provider for the public and small business. I think the changes to Windows 11 is gearing up to work with organizations to create a surveillance state. So I have to decided to promote Linux over Windows for computers I build for customers. If you have any suggestions on how I can make this promotion, better let me know.

If you're going to do this, set them up with something they can get commercial support for. IMO, if a user's needs can be met with a Chromebook, Linux + a browser + email + Zoom/or whatever would suit them well. I think you're going to have a hard sell if they rely on Office or other Windows-only software, and although well meaning, it might be doing them a disservice if they can't run the software they're accustomed…

Wine to run Office on Linux?

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#105
This is an excellent article as well as a sign of the times. I wish the list of Linux choices had included Mint, which is essentially Ubuntu without Snaps. Snaps are a partly closed-source Ubuntu project that contradicts the open nature of Linux.

Linux users can install the free software suite LibreOffice, which not only replaces Office but reads and writes the same file formats. Many similar choices exist, this is just one.

Gamers can install the free Steam game compatibility layer on Linux, then play many of the same games they play on Windows.

Meanwhile, Redmond's recent requirement that everyone sign up for a Microsoft account, and its pushing the Recall eavesdropping-to-cloud feature with no user opt-out provisions, clearly signals Microsoft's belief that their customers should't be allowed to choose.

Here is a list of current Windows traits that should be options, but are out of an end-user's control:

* Required Microsoft account.

* User tracking and telemetry without knowledge or consent.

* OneDrive, which is cloud storage and tracking, requires technical skill to disable.

* Desktop-recall images to the cloud, essentially Microsoft mass surveillance.

* Edge browser, cannot disable or remove.

* Unintuitive user interface, out of user's control.

* Advertising everywhere.

All these frequently heard complaints are addressed by Linux, and Linux is free.

I've been a Linux user for 30 years. I maintain one Windows dual-boot system, partly to help friends deal with Windows issues, partly to entertain myself with what most people believe constitutes a normal end-user computer experience.

A bit of context -- my first computer was an Apple II in 1977, so my definition of personal computing might seem out of touch with modern times (https://www.atariarchives.org/deli/cottage_computer_programm...).

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't recommend deploying ublock on customer machines. Or at least ask what their workflow is first. There are a ton of SaaS sites that break with ad locking enabled. I run firefox+UBO+privacy badger on my machines, and the only sites I've had to disable my privacy extensions in the last few years for were work related, B2B SaaS apps. A few years ago I pushed UBO to user machines (Chrome on win10) at work, and h…

If they don't remember the two-click procedure for toggling ublock on a website that they want to be using , they weren't paying attention when they were told or showed that, and all they need is a remedial work training session to hammer it in.

I mean, easier said than done. We pay accountants because they are good at their specialized field. They have knowledge and experience I don't, and there's certainly things that are obvious and simple to them that I don't know 9r remember.

It's really easy to just say it's the LUsers fault and make pebkac jokes, and I definitely enjoy BOFH style humor, but honestly not everyone will remember the 30 seconds of training to go into this menu and toggle off an extension if netsuite throws a cryptic error or won't behave properly. I find it's better to have some empathy for other people, not everyone thinks like a computer and connecting 'I have this error message full of gibberish about API calls' and 'the IT guy mentioned 2 months ago that if a site isn't loading, I need to turn off this thing'.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#108
Nobody thinks this is a weird reaction to an OS update that's been out for years at this point and barely makes a difference over the previous version?

There's no 'Recall'. Co-pilot isn't all over in your face so removing it isn't really a priority. Edge isn't forced on you, it's just part of the bundled software just like a bunch of other items as in every Windows for decades. Not saying it doesn't get hairy if you're going out of your way to remove them or not be in the ecosystem, but consumers don't care, and for the most part stuff isn't being forced in front of them.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#109
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the face of it they're just security features, and I don't deny they are, but the industry as a whole are using those features to implement device verification systems that are being used to lock down their platforms and centralize control over their software ecosystems. Being able to install another OS isn't much good if critical applications and websites refuse to run on it.

>Being able to install another OS isn't much good if critical applications and websites refuse to run on it. The battle has already been lost on this. Just look at all the companies that are app-only and don't offer a web version.

I wouldn't say it's lost, but the trendlines aren't good.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would say that specifically with Secure Boot, Microsoft actually promoted user choice: A Windows Logo compliant PC needs to have Microsoft's root of trust installed by default. Microsoft could have stopped there, but they didn't. This was not the case with the initial rollout of Secure Boot, it was combined with locked BIOS to lock PCs so that they could only boot Windows 8 on some devices. This was the case on W…

> There is also a real potential for abusing TPMs or cryptographic co-processors to enforce remote attestation. People here REALLY need to start understanding this issue. Remote Attestation is the kind of tech that if abused will end free computing over night.

Remote attestation is already here with Play Protect/Integrity on Android, and Microsoft's Pluton co-processor enables the same thing
Post reply on HN