Don't see any problem, as I have adblock installed.
This isn't in your browser, this is in your entire operating system...
Adblock won't do anything to help you with this one.
181–190 of 240 posts
Don't see any problem, as I have adblock installed.
This isn't in your browser, this is in your entire operating system...
Adblock won't do anything to help you with this one.
I don't think Ubuntu has really thought this through. Besides the privacy problems, making your software into adware is incredibly destructive to its image. Ubuntu can no longer be used by any self-respecting or privacy-conscious company or individual. Imagine the CTO of IBM - "So, this Ubuntu is adware? And it sends all our searches to Amazon? Are you kidding me? Get out of my office and get me a list of real OSes,…
This is pure hyperbole. It would take one of IBM's Linux IT people half an hour to modify the Ubuntu disc image to remove the offending package.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is pure hyperbole. It would take one of IBM's Linux IT people half an hour to modify the Ubuntu disc image to remove the offending package.
The technical situation has NOTHING to do with this problem. It is a social problem, an image problem, a branding problem. Ubuntu is now low-class software, and high-class people use high-class software.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is pure hyperbole. It would take one of IBM's Linux IT people half an hour to modify the Ubuntu disc image to remove the offending package.
The technical situation has NOTHING to do with this problem. It is a social problem, an image problem, a branding problem. Ubuntu is now low-class software, and high-class people use high-class software.
Someone has opened a bug report about this in LaunchPad. If you think this is a terrible mistake by Canonical, and that it should be fixed, you can mark yourself as affected by this bug too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-shoppin...
That yellow circle with the pencil in it. It should yield a pop-up for you to state whether it affects you.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is pure hyperbole. It would take one of IBM's Linux IT people half an hour to modify the Ubuntu disc image to remove the offending package.
The technical situation has NOTHING to do with this problem. It is a social problem, an image problem, a branding problem. Ubuntu is now low-class software, and high-class people use high-class software.
Honestly, if Ubuntu dropped their ridiculous, underdeveloped, undersupported Ubuntu One services and partnered with Amazon to integrate theirs (Cloud Player/Cloud Drive/etc), that would be a MAJOR improvement for both them and the end-user. Excellent cross-platform cloud services and marketplaces integrated with the OS would be great for bringing less-technical users to the platform in the wake of the proposed "Windo…
It would be a major improvement... For users in the United States. For everybody else, it would be completely useless.
It is beyond time for Ubuntu to quit pussyfooting around and partner with ASUS or some other competent hardware manufacturer* and sell Ubuntu-branded laptops on the Ubuntu website. The Linux desktop (in various incarnations) has been in "testing" for over 15 years. Shuttleworth created Canonical and hired designers and developers to put together a 1st-class desktop system. Time to double down. Try and get some real c…
I would buy this. Even if Acer would come with Ubuntu instead of their Linpus thing, it would be a huge win. Knowing I get a 100% Ubuntu certified laptop would make me ignore the brand.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't an unsurmountable problem, and they would know what user wishes were and where the revenue came from. Would it be accurate to the nearest cent? Nope, but it would be close enough.
I don't point it out as a technical problem, but as a privacy one.