Is 128 GB of unified memory enough? I've found that the smaller models are great as a toy but useless for anything realistic. Will 128 GB hold any model that you can do actual work with or query for answers that returns useful information?
Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
31–40 of 116 posts
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#32Also, the other reviews I’ve seen point out that inference speed is slower than a 5090 (or on par with a 4090 with some tailwind), so the big difference here (other than core counts) is the large chunk of “unified” memory. Still seems like a tricky investment in an age where a Mac will outlive everything else you care to put on a desk and AMD has semi-viable APUs with equivalent memory architectures (even if RoCm is… well… not all there yet).
Curious to compare this with cloud-based GPU costs, or (if you really want on-prem and fully private) the returns from a more conventional rig.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#33Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#34I’m kind of surprised at the issues everyone is having with the arm64 hardware. PyTorch has been building official wheels for several months already as people get on GH200s. Has the rest of the ecosystem not kept up?
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#35About what I expected. The Jetson series had the same issues, mostly, at a smaller scale: Deviate from the anointed versions of YOLO, and nothing runs without a lot of hacking. Being beholden to CUDA is both a blessing and a curse, but what I really fear is how long it will take for this to become an unsupported golden brick. Also, the other reviews I’ve seen point out that inference speed is slower than a 5090 (or o…
I have no immediate numbers for prefill, but the memory bandwidth is ~4x greater on a 4090 which will lead to ~4x faster decode.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#36Is 128 GB of unified memory enough? I've found that the smaller models are great as a toy but useless for anything realistic. Will 128 GB hold any model that you can do actual work with or query for answers that returns useful information?
The 120B model is better but too slow since I only have 16GB VRAM. That model runs decent[1] on the Spark.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#37About what I expected. The Jetson series had the same issues, mostly, at a smaller scale: Deviate from the anointed versions of YOLO, and nothing runs without a lot of hacking. Being beholden to CUDA is both a blessing and a curse, but what I really fear is how long it will take for this to become an unsupported golden brick. Also, the other reviews I’ve seen point out that inference speed is slower than a 5090 (or o…
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#38Is 128 GB of unified memory enough? I've found that the smaller models are great as a toy but useless for anything realistic. Will 128 GB hold any model that you can do actual work with or query for answers that returns useful information?
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#39For inference decode the bandwidth is the main limitation so if running LLMs is your use case you should probably get a Mac instead.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark: great hardware, early days for the ecosystem
#40As is usual for NVidia: great hardware, an effing nightmare figuring out how to setup the pile of crap they call software.
If you think their software is bad try using any other vendor , makes nvidia looks amazing. Apple is only one close