61–70 of 260 posts
Do members of parliament also need to provide their IDs when they want to jerk off?
Yes, but we pay for their VPN: https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/vpns/nordvpn-is-the-most...
Because they're the only ones who are profiting from this fiasco! /s
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume it's mostly symbolic and/or serving some greater legal purpose.
Threatening with prison or a fine of double digit millions of pounds doesn't seem very symbolic.
Many people are saying this is symbolic and cannot be enforced. Unfortunately, that's just not true. Look at what happened to the founder of Telegram. Some jurisdiction decides you're violating their laws, all you need to do is catch a connecting flight or take a vacation on their soil or a place that will eagerly extradite, and you're a political prisoner. What happens if one of the officers of 4Chan or Gab is on a…
No it isn’t.
I was not aware of the main driver, not mentioned, sanctioned suicide even existing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctioned_Suicide
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but we pay for their VPN: https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/vpns/nordvpn-is-the-most...
Perhaps this whole ofcom business is the result of foreign VPN companies lobbying to increase market penetration in the UK? Because they're the only ones who are profiting from this fiasco! /s
He'd pop into 'law streams' from time to time to talk about cases and discuss newsworthy events out of the courts.
He is as if New Jersey was transmuted into a man (I say that with great affection).
I want to say, and I could be wrong, I became familiar with his name during the Rittenhouse trial. Or maybe the couple high profile trials after the Rittenhouse trial, that were popular while we all waited for covid to be 'over'.
For whatever that's worth
edit: he IS a real lawyer with real clients and real cases. I don't want to diminish anything because I called him a 'youtube lawyer'. I think it's more: A lawyer that sees value in being on youtube from time to time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It can stop the owners being able to travel to the UK or risk being detained.
> It can stop the owners being able to travel to the UK or risk being detained. Big loss, that destination.
I think the end state of this will be when Trump links prosecutions like this to tariff deals, and Kier Starmer will have to choose between mean words on the internet or further damage to an economy in already bad shape.