Live data from Hacker News

A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

larslofgren.com

281–290 of 996 posts

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A bad actor mod of a popular subreddit can persist for years, visibly, without people managing either to oust the mod, or to take down the sub's influence. This happens because the regular users have no power. I remember seeing some article that said a small number of mods control most of the popular subreddits. Many of them put their own bias into the system by banning users, banning sources, deleting content base…

When the mods of major subs are also mods for over a hundred other subs, you have to doubt how much actual moderating they are actually doing in their holier-than-thou positions.

It's also why expressing certain views is effectively forbidden across most of the site. These moderators have far too much control over the conversation.

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#282
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>EDIT: I don't know why I'm getting so many downvotes, nothing I said is controversial at all. I personally found it off topic, the conversation was about using Reddit as a source of truth for product opinions/reviews and it’s unlikely that the absence of a right wing majority is relevant when purchasing a dishwasher.

It wasn't off-topic. His response was to this statement: "the most reliable place to get a general crowd-sourced opinion on the internet" - on which his statement was perfectly correct if he just sticks to Western forums.

Ok: "any forum where there isn't a direct motive for product/service recommendation or ideological bias (and absent the moderator having a bias or strong opinion on that topic)".

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Mods can ban anyone for any reason Yes, they can and that's how it's set up. Each community makes their own rules and can choose who participates. It's not Reddit. It's the sub that made the decision and I'm not sure how it would be possible for Reddit the company to deal with sub level rule complaints and appeals.

There are some big wins that they've never taken care of, despite spez talking big about fixing them, e.g.: stop allowing mods to pre-emptively ban you. I don't know anyone who uses Reddit that isn't banned from r/pics simply because they posted somewhere else on Reddit. The list of subs they ban for is huge.

That's pretty crazy. I've been on reddit since its inception and have never been banned from pics despite having posted on all kinds of unsavory subreddits over the decades.

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Argh, there isn't one - is the message we're trying to get you to accept. Just because reddit is reliable vs its peers != absolutely reliable. Like Amazon, Yelp, Google any review system will become gamified for money. So just like those platforms every review you read you need to ask "who is the reviewer? do they review other things? how 'realistic' does it read? Are they pushing anything? Is the thing i'm reading a…

> is the message we're trying to get you to accept You're replying to a comment where I said I agree with the statement "Reddit should not be considered an authoritative source"

With the phrase "the most reliable" which is a phrase to mean the subject you're describing is inherently reliable. Meaning you can read the reviews on reddit differently than amazon, yelp, and the rest. If reddit reviews can't be read differently vs others, why "most reliable"?

You're trying to walk a line that says reddit not authoritative and yet reliable. In this specific context authoritative also comes to mean reliable. So we're at reddit is not reliable yet reliable?

I'm saying it can't be. The well has been poisoned and it's not safe to pray it didn't mix. That you need to treat reddit with the same skepticism lest you be taken for your money. Perhaps you don't agree, which is fair then we agree-disagree.

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe the phrase that applies here is "put up or shut up". If you have hordes of documents to draw on as primary sources, then it should be pretty simple (but perhaps time consuming) to write a rebuttal.

[flagged]

Is it a hit piece? It’s well argued and comes with sources, which is more than you’ve offered.

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One thing is a critic based on verifiable facts. Another thing is defending yourself. A third one is coming up with bad things nobody can verify. Your post mixes these things

[flagged]

This is some fourth thing...

What does anything there have to do with any of the questions people in this thread are asking you?

I don't see anything there that adds anything to the story except solidifying the picture of you as an obsessive stalker. It certainly doesn't help your case.

In case I overlooked some key detail, please point it out.

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#288

Reddit should not be considered an authoritative source. Period. At this point it's the most astroturfed place on the internet. Accounts are bought and sold like cheap commodities. It's inherently unreliable. That said, in this instance Codesmith actually has an unusually strong defamation case. That Reddit mod is not anonymous, and has made solid claims (about nepotism with fabricated details, accusations of resume…

I've seen users with NSFW profiles leaving (relatively more) inane comments and their profile is private, so their posts and comments are not shown. I dread the day we can no longer evaluate users behind the comments.

You can now just outright hide your profile/history even without NSFW content. Its a really good feature for everyone involved.

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the story there? I'm curious to know how such behavior manifests in Zen Buddhism, of all things.

Many folks end up in r/zen after reading books like “Zen Mind, Beginners Mind” written by Japanese Zen Buddhists. Ewk is obsessed with the Chinese source material, written by Chan (Chinese for Zen) masters, and believes that the Chinese Chan masters were not Buddhist at all. Many people who come to the subreddit are interested in meditation. It is a big focus of Japanese Zen as practiced in the west. It is not partic…

You're reminding me of the old 'News of the Weird' (RIP) category "No Longer Weird: frequently recurring stories that have been retired from circulation: ... violence breaks out at peace conference ...".

Re: A competitor crippled a $23.5M bootcamp by becoming a Reddit moderator

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed, try to figure out how I benefit in any way from Codesmith's decline. Not theoretical, but hard facts. I know of THREE people that considered going to Codesmith and went to Formation instead. One of them I tried very hard to convince to go to Codesmith and she instead got a job on her own and then came to Formation. All of this for three customers? It doesn't add up and there are some missing pieces in the sto…

Why did you obsessively stalk and harass people? Very, very weird behavior.

Stalking is a serious allegation.

If you want to publish your projects everywhere under the sun in public and ask for them to be 'stared on Github', giving people a script to instantly vote 50 claps on Medium, etc...

Then I can open up those people's LinkedIns and note down how they represent themselves.

Is that weird? I don't think so but you can decide, but it's not stalking and harassing.

If that's stalking then the guy who wrote the post was stalking the hell out of me.

Post reply on HN