Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm the victim and yes, this is not entirelly about AI. If you have read the hall of shame, you'll know that they tends to lie. If it was only someone tried to use my code as their basis and forgot to include the attribution, after my notice they added, it's totally not worth a "hall of shame", and I'm actually glad that someone finally appreciates my works and make them useful. But the reality is, they lied to every…
Based on what you just said, it's not a copyright issue since you admitted that they gave attribution of which we can all see in their licenses and in some file notices. And based on my analysis of their codebase and as someone who's been coding for 20 years and what you just admitted to its not an AI issue either. Anyone who knows how to code would be able to tell AI Slop from structured human code. However, you kep…
> which we can all see in their licenses and in some file notices.
Not enough. If not they have lied to me, I won't care about the file-level attribution at all.
> I think the value should be what problem you are solving in a unique way
Yes, the code contain my own construction of a signal system implementation and my own algorithms that AI's can't get them shuffled or rewritten.
> which may put the other party off and force them not to collaborate with you
I actually assisted them pretty well at the beginning, until I discovered that they're lying. They reached me through NativeScript(which is proved to be another vitim of them later), and promise me that they're making a huge ambitious project that even Google and Meta failed.But they're making really really basic mistakes that even a noob should know where the problem is, and they didn't even try to address the problem themselves - I pointed out the problem, and they just refuse to investigate and debug, refusing it really hard. It's them that first starting to not cooperate.
> Also, Imagine someone added your own project to their hall of shame, you would no longer want to work with them would you?
This happens *after* their non-cooperation.
> which it seems if they where introduced by NativeScript.
NativeScript is also been lied to. They tell me that they plan to acquire NativeScript but failed at giving evidences that they have the ability to do so. When I asked NativeScript side about the acquision, they're shocked to hear this, and denied the possibility of being acquired as it is now a OpenJS Foundation project.
> Since they where introduced to you by a trusted party
That's their trick. They claim they worked for Nvidia, it tricks NativeScript and then they can use NativeScript's introduction to trick me. It is almost impossible to verify that they really worked for NV but it tricks people into beliving they're capable of something big, but actually they can't even debug such a simple problem on their own.
> Also you mentioned they Sponsored you in the hall of shame this is not the behavior of people with bad intentions.
It's also their trick. They want to get much more from me beyond the project itself, totally ignoring that I have my own projects and plan. Also the price they claim to pay for what I'm going to do is really really low, considering how ambitious the project is and how incapable themselves are.