Live data from Hacker News

SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

cbsnews.com

141–150 of 493 posts

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#141
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Equinix Dallas was hours from running out of fuel during the last snowpocalypse.

An exchange having to stop trading and gracefully shut down their systems for a few days doesn't really strike me as a disaster though.

It might be slightly inconvenient to people who want to sell their shares.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#142

The Miami stock exchange (MIAX) has their matching engines colocated in Equinix's NY4 data center in Secaucus NJ, much like many other exchanges. I would not be surprised if TXSE does the same. Many trading firms already have their trading engines in that data center and I would assume TXSE would want quick access to that order flow and this might be easier if they are in NY4. Of course, they may want to have their c…

> I would assume TXSE would want quick access to that order flow Perhaps Texas could use a different trading model that doesn't require ultra high speed trading. Matt Levine often mulls the idea of a system with a trading window that doesn't let the fastest connection to the order book win. Perhaps an order book that works at human speeds so humans can trade too (I can think of a few ways to do it - but would need mo…

And Australian companies often list in the US.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Is this true though? Texas has had some well-publicized failures (well, really one major one), but as best as I can tell they are more or less middle of the pack on grid reliability[1]. I mean, you'll need a backup generator anywhere, but the report I found (admittedly with just a bit of googling) makes it seem like Texas is a better potential location than quite a few states (including California). [1] - https://www…

The really major one is the only one that matters. If you are running a datacenter that needs to always be up and running, you're going to need backup power. A power grid that goes down once a decade for multiple weeks is far worse than one that goes down for 5 minutes once a week.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#144
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"There have been 263 power outages across Texas since 2019, more than any other state, each lasting an average of 160 minutes and impacting an estimated average of 172,000 Texans, according to an analysis by electricity retailer Payless Power ( https://paylesspower.com/blog/blackout-tracker/ )" Also in 2021 210 people died. This is a huge deal. This wasn't just a little outage.

Texas has installed a vast number of solar and battery backup systems since 2019. And it will be a few years, but is going HEAVILY into nuclear (and for the next 3.5, is going to get auto-approval to actually build them. ERCOT is changing fast, don't rehash stale narratives.

Also wind, more than 40GW installed capacity, leading the USA and ahead of many other countries.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#145
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Equinix Dallas was hours from running out of fuel during the last snowpocalypse.

An exchange having to stop trading and gracefully shut down their systems for a few days doesn't really strike me as a disaster though.

The NYSE was only closed for 3 business days after 9/11. Uptime is important for listed companies.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Couldn’t they just send some hardware down Texas to co-locate there (presuming specialist hardware) and add another deployment target for their software? Would it be that hard?

The issue is the speed of light.

Not really because anyone running a trading strategy that needs to worry about latency is already running their servers in the same datacenter as the exchange, so that just moves with it. What probably is an issue is that the datacenters required for a market don't look like AWS datacenters. I don't have any direct experience here, but I would be shocked if HFT software is something you could just deploy to a standard VM like on AWS.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#147
post #141
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An exchange having to stop trading and gracefully shut down their systems for a few days doesn't really strike me as a disaster though.

It might be slightly inconvenient to people who want to sell their shares.

Not really because there are a lot of stock markets these days.

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#148
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There were already two exchanges. I don't think this changes much.

More than that, London and Tokyo both have well known exchanges, and large US companies are often listed on both of those as well. If you tried to tell me that no other country has an exchange I'd call you a lair without bothering to fact check you. (My impression is New York, London, and Tokyo are the big ones that matter in the world and everything else is a me too - but in their niche/country they may still be a b…

HK as well

Re: SEC approves Texas Stock Exchange, first new US integrated exchange in decades

#149

The Miami stock exchange (MIAX) has their matching engines colocated in Equinix's NY4 data center in Secaucus NJ, much like many other exchanges. I would not be surprised if TXSE does the same. Many trading firms already have their trading engines in that data center and I would assume TXSE would want quick access to that order flow and this might be easier if they are in NY4. Of course, they may want to have their c…

> I would assume TXSE would want quick access to that order flow Perhaps Texas could use a different trading model that doesn't require ultra high speed trading. Matt Levine often mulls the idea of a system with a trading window that doesn't let the fastest connection to the order book win. Perhaps an order book that works at human speeds so humans can trade too (I can think of a few ways to do it - but would need mo…

IEX tried this to much fanfare. Turns out most participants don’t particularly care about that as a motivating factor.
Post reply on HN