Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers

nullpt.rs

31–40 of 58 posts

Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers

#31

For anyone that doesn't want to maintain a fork of chromium, just download the PDB and hook it at runtime for spoofing and/or dumping call logs. For hook itself just add your dll as a dependency in the PE structure.

That sounds like a Windows-only approach though.

Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers

#34
post #31

For anyone that doesn't want to maintain a fork of chromium, just download the PDB and hook it at runtime for spoofing and/or dumping call logs. For hook itself just add your dll as a dependency in the PE structure.

That sounds like a Windows-only approach though.

pdb's exist for all builds of google chrome.

Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers

#39
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To note, there are undocumented detections to even Proxys, for example using `in` operator in v8 (such as `proxiedFunc in 1` for some proxied function). Really cool to see a project like this.

How do you use `in` in v8 to detect proxies? I assume its a difference in the exception, but the message and the cause were the same in both direct and proxied `x in 1`.

Ah wow, good catch- yeah, you're right, this technique seems to be patched

Re: Show HN: I'm building a browser for reverse engineers

#40
I am amazed what you've accomplished here: adding your own custom CDP domain. Years ago I gave up on trying to hack Chromium (I wanted to learn how to add back Manifest Version 2 support before it got removed.).

Build times were way longer on my potato hardware. Since then I haven't touched much C++.

Post reply on HN