Live data from Hacker News

Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

guru3d.com

31–40 of 679 posts

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#31
post #25

> According to some reports, sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models dropped sharply in the months after the restriction was introduced. What did NAS customers purchase instead? I honestly can’t believe anyone at Synology thought this would turn out differently.

Change Synology with HP, NAS with printer and HDD with ink cartridge. How does that sound like?

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#32
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe they were basically saying a set list of approved hard drives

So you're saying the photo of a Synology branded (rebranded) 4TB HDD from the article is fake?

No I wasn't saying it was fake. I believe that was one of the approved but rebranded drives

You can find the compatible drives here https://www.synology.com/en-uk/compatibility

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#34
post #31
post #25

> According to some reports, sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models dropped sharply in the months after the restriction was introduced. What did NAS customers purchase instead? I honestly can’t believe anyone at Synology thought this would turn out differently.

Change Synology with HP, NAS with printer and HDD with ink cartridge. How does that sound like?

The printer market is a cartel with everyone pulling the same bullshit. DIYing an affordable and performant printer is out of reach for the individual. Printer ink is not a commodity otherwise. Consumers don't really have alternatives.

Desktop NAS market is very different.

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#35

Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives. I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.

If you just want storage and not apps, Ubiquiti's UNAS line is a much better choice, especially if you're in their ecosystem.

[deleted]

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#36
post #16

Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives. I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.

I honestly think continuing to buy Synology is likely a mistake: not only have they not even properly apologized for this insanely bad anti-consumer decision, it's merely one of many over the past few years. (I speak as an 1819+ owner.) If you're not interested in running your own, I think the most promising option is the UniFi UNAS which is due to be shipping soon (edit: Already has actually. A new model is due to s…

After I heard from someone who worked there about how incredibly bad their code and software development practices are I wouldn’t trust them with my data. And that was for their enterprise products.

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#38
post #34
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Change Synology with HP, NAS with printer and HDD with ink cartridge. How does that sound like?

The printer market is a cartel with everyone pulling the same bullshit. DIYing an affordable and performant printer is out of reach for the individual. Printer ink is not a commodity otherwise. Consumers don't really have alternatives. Desktop NAS market is very different.

> Desktop NAS market is very different.

This was the first step or attempt to change that.

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#39

Don't get confused here: they didn't decide that their policy change was wrong — they just didn't expect quite as much backlash. Make your purchasing decisions accordingly.

Yes exactly - and they still have aging hardware, only 1Gb Ethernet and have recently nerfed H.265 support.

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#40
post #25

> According to some reports, sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models dropped sharply in the months after the restriction was introduced. What did NAS customers purchase instead? I honestly can’t believe anyone at Synology thought this would turn out differently.

Yeah, I was waiting for the DS1525+, but after it was announced and the HD restrictions were confirmed, I eventually decided to buy the DS1522+ instead.
Post reply on HN