> According to some reports, sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models dropped sharply in the months after the restriction was introduced. What did NAS customers purchase instead? I honestly can’t believe anyone at Synology thought this would turn out differently.
Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
31–40 of 679 posts
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe they were basically saying a set list of approved hard drives
So you're saying the photo of a Synology branded (rebranded) 4TB HDD from the article is fake?
You can find the compatible drives here https://www.synology.com/en-uk/compatibility
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#33Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#34> According to some reports, sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models dropped sharply in the months after the restriction was introduced. What did NAS customers purchase instead? I honestly can’t believe anyone at Synology thought this would turn out differently.
Change Synology with HP, NAS with printer and HDD with ink cartridge. How does that sound like?
Desktop NAS market is very different.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#35Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives. I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.
If you just want storage and not apps, Ubiquiti's UNAS line is a much better choice, especially if you're in their ecosystem.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#36Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives. I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.
I honestly think continuing to buy Synology is likely a mistake: not only have they not even properly apologized for this insanely bad anti-consumer decision, it's merely one of many over the past few years. (I speak as an 1819+ owner.) If you're not interested in running your own, I think the most promising option is the UniFi UNAS which is due to be shipping soon (edit: Already has actually. A new model is due to s…
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#37If Synology want me back as a customer, they also need to get modern CPUs, 2.5Gb or 10Gb Ethernet and reverse course on H.265 too.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Change Synology with HP, NAS with printer and HDD with ink cartridge. How does that sound like?
The printer market is a cartel with everyone pulling the same bullshit. DIYing an affordable and performant printer is out of reach for the individual. Printer ink is not a commodity otherwise. Consumers don't really have alternatives. Desktop NAS market is very different.
This was the first step or attempt to change that.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#39Don't get confused here: they didn't decide that their policy change was wrong — they just didn't expect quite as much backlash. Make your purchasing decisions accordingly.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#40> According to some reports, sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models dropped sharply in the months after the restriction was introduced. What did NAS customers purchase instead? I honestly can’t believe anyone at Synology thought this would turn out differently.