> Foreigners poured a record $290bn into US stocks in the second quarter and now own about 30 per cent of the market — the highest share in post-second world war history. Europeans and Canadians have been boycotting American goods but continue buying US stocks in bulk — especially the tech giants. I fail to find any plausible explanation for this other than the fact that yes, it is a bubble. Tesla, a car company faci…
America is now one big bet on AI
51–60 of 193 posts
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#52Its not a bubble because the economy isnt actually about trade any more, its about power. The people in power now know that control over technology is the name of the game. It doesnt have to have a return on investment, it has to enable control of public opinion and eventually, robots.
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#53Its not a bubble because the economy isnt actually about trade any more, its about power. The people in power now know that control over technology is the name of the game. It doesnt have to have a return on investment, it has to enable control of public opinion and eventually, robots.
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#54Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#55Its not a bubble because the economy isnt actually about trade any more, its about power. The people in power now know that control over technology is the name of the game. It doesnt have to have a return on investment, it has to enable control of public opinion and eventually, robots.
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
China's also betting on AI. There's massive domestic effort towards model parity and custom ICs.
Additionally, to my knowledge, China is also doing significantly better on energy production and clean energy at that versus the US. In the US, we are terrified of nuclear and the administration is trying to make economically worse energy production the norm because they are stuck in the past. If there is an AI race, I have zero doubt that China WILL win simply because of energy production and the government's willin…
A race to what? What does the winner get? What does the loser get? What does 'winning' even fucking mean? My statistical next token predictor is better than your statistical next token predictor?
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#57> Foreigners poured a record $290bn into US stocks in the second quarter and now own about 30 per cent of the market — the highest share in post-second world war history. Europeans and Canadians have been boycotting American goods but continue buying US stocks in bulk — especially the tech giants. I fail to find any plausible explanation for this other than the fact that yes, it is a bubble. Tesla, a car company faci…
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#58Sloppy opinion piece. Stock market increases are bad because it makes rich people happy, but select US sectors are lagging behind Europe which is somehow also bad. Low immigration resulting in a labor force squeeze is bad, but this is offset by reduced demand because of AI, which is, you guessed it, also bad lol
Why is this sloppy. The author is not saying that AI is bad but that the current capital being invested in the UD is mostly betting on AI. If you remove AI then what is left?
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#59Key quote: > The hundreds of billions of dollars companies are investing in AI now account for an astonishing 40 per cent share of US GDP growth this year. In other words, investment in AI is a massive private-sector stimulus program, powering economic growth. Questions for which no one knows the answer include: * Will these AI investments earn a positive rate of return in the aggregate? * Without these investments o…
Re: America is now one big bet on AI
#60Its not a bubble because the economy isnt actually about trade any more, its about power. The people in power now know that control over technology is the name of the game. It doesnt have to have a return on investment, it has to enable control of public opinion and eventually, robots.
it is just simpler to claim that AI is useful hence the investment instead of a roundabout explanation with power.