If you ask it loaded questions the way the CIA would pose them, it censors the answer though lmao
NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
11–20 of 251 posts
Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#12Let them demonize it. I'll use the capable and cheap model and gain competitive advantage.
Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#13[flagged]
I wonder what it's like to be so convinced of your righteousness of your cause that reality itself is seondary. What a joke you are.
Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#14I'm not at all surprised, US agencies have long since been political tools whenever the subject matter crosses national borders. I appreciate this take as someone who has been skeptical of Chinese electronics. While I agree this report is BS and xenophobic, I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Just like the US would,…
> I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Like what, exactly?
I also don't think it's just China, the US will absolutely order American providers to do the same. It's a perfect access point for installing backdoors into foreign systems.
Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#15Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#16I'm not at all surprised, US agencies have long since been political tools whenever the subject matter crosses national borders. I appreciate this take as someone who has been skeptical of Chinese electronics. While I agree this report is BS and xenophobic, I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Just like the US would,…
> I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Like what, exactly?
Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#17 DeepSeek performance lags behind the best U.S. reference models.
DeepSeek models cost more to use than comparable U.S. models.
DeepSeek models are far more susceptible to jailbreaking attacks than U.S. models.
DeepSeek models advance Chinese Communist Party (CCP) narratives.
Adoption of PRC models has greatly increased since DeepSeek R1 was released.
[1] https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/09/caisi-evaluati...Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#18I love how "Open" got redefined in the last few years. I am glad there a models with weights available but it ain't "Open Science".
Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece
#19I'm not at all surprised, US agencies have long since been political tools whenever the subject matter crosses national borders. I appreciate this take as someone who has been skeptical of Chinese electronics. While I agree this report is BS and xenophobic, I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Just like the US would,…
> I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Like what, exactly?