Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

shujisado.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

251–260 of 270 posts

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#251

Post by kelseyfrog »

EnergyAmy wrote: post #248
kelseyfrog wrote: post #245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm asking what you think a genuine response would be from someone who disagrees with you. So far, it appears that that doesn't exist. Is there any response you can construct that you feel would meet the criteria of being genuine? It's a very simple request.

As per my previous comment: > Do you agree or disagree that "trans people existing" is too vague to be meaningful? Alternatively, what exactly do you mean by "existing"? A genuine response would be responding to that, not metacommentary while refusing to engage. A simple response of "By existing I mean ..." would be perfectly genuine.

Are you capable of providing an example? yes or no? Happy to read what you think it would constitute.

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#252

Post by EnergyAmy »

kelseyfrog wrote: post #251
EnergyAmy wrote: post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As per my previous comment: > Do you agree or disagree that "trans people existing" is too vague to be meaningful? Alternatively, what exactly do you mean by "existing"? A genuine response would be responding to that, not metacommentary while refusing to engage. A simple response of "By existing I mean ..." would be perfectly genuine.

Are you capable of providing an example? yes or no? Happy to read what you think it would constitute.

"By existing I mean ..."

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#253

Post by kelseyfrog »

EnergyAmy wrote: post #252
kelseyfrog wrote: post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you capable of providing an example? yes or no? Happy to read what you think it would constitute.

"By existing I mean ..."

I'm sorry. It appears your response was cut off prematurely. Can you finish it please?

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#254

Post by EnergyAmy »

kelseyfrog wrote: post #253
EnergyAmy wrote: post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"By existing I mean ..."

I'm sorry. It appears your response was cut off prematurely. Can you finish it please?

Perhaps you would like to be able to finish it please? Are We going to Chat? I can't help you without a dialog!

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#255

Post by kelseyfrog »

EnergyAmy wrote: post #254
kelseyfrog wrote: post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sorry. It appears your response was cut off prematurely. Can you finish it please?

Perhaps you would like to be able to finish it please? Are We going to Chat? I can't help you without a dialog!

I'm not sure how to make this any clearer. I've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If you wish to provide an example(and I hope you do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#256

Post by EnergyAmy »

kelseyfrog wrote: post #255
EnergyAmy wrote: post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps you would like to be able to finish it please? Are We going to Chat? I can't help you without a dialog!

I'm not sure how to make this any clearer. I've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If you wish to provide an example(and I hope you do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

Do you believe it is normal to be not sure how to make this any clearer. you're not going to engage in debate. you've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If me wish to provide an example( and you hope me do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#257

Post by kelseyfrog »

EnergyAmy wrote: post #256
kelseyfrog wrote: post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure how to make this any clearer. I've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If you wish to provide an example(and I hope you do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

Do you believe it is normal to be not sure how to make this any clearer. you're not going to engage in debate. you've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If me wish to provide an example( and you hope me do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

You seem to be broken. Thank you for your time.

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#258

Post by EnergyAmy »

kelseyfrog wrote: post #257
EnergyAmy wrote: post #256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you believe it is normal to be not sure how to make this any clearer. you're not going to engage in debate. you've asked for an example from the beginning. An example contains both sides. If me wish to provide an example( and you hope me do) it will consist of two interlocutors with 10 to 20 individual statements. The example will demonstrate genuine debate. Do you understand the request?

You seem to be broken. Thank you for your time.

We were discussing you, not me. Are We going to Chat?

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#259

Post by kelseyfrog »

EnergyAmy wrote: post #258
kelseyfrog wrote: post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You seem to be broken. Thank you for your time.

We were discussing you, not me. Are We going to Chat?

I'm not asking for a chat. I'm asking for an example of a genuine discussion on the aforementioned topic. It's unclear while, being clearly unable to provide one, you don't seem to acknowledge that.

Re: Heavy codes of conduct are unnecessary for open source projects

#260

Post by thrance »

account42 wrote: post #236
squigz wrote: post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The irony of deriding CoCs while reminiscing about doing things with "weird people" "Weird people" being discriminated against and harassed is why CoCs exist.

Quite the opposite, the whole point of CoCs is to get actually weird people (i.e. nerds) out of projects and replace them with cultural conformists that all use the same kinds of symbols and language in their bio to describe just how unique they are.

No, the point is to get the bigots out. I don't know of any CoCs that prohibits "nerds" in an open-source project, don't be daft. Also, not fun how you're implying that being from a marginalized group and being a nerd are mutually exclusive.
Post reply on HN