Live data from Hacker News

How the AI Bubble Will Pop

derekthompson.org

1–10 of 531 posts

Re: How the AI Bubble Will Pop

#2
> Some people think artificial intelligence will be the most important technology of the 21st century.

I don’t, I think a workable fusion reactor will be the most important technology of the 21st century.

Re: How the AI Bubble Will Pop

#5
post #2

> Some people think artificial intelligence will be the most important technology of the 21st century. I don’t, I think a workable fusion reactor will be the most important technology of the 21st century.

if AI won't be a fad like everything else, we're going to need these, pronto

...and it does seem this time that we aren't even in the huge overcapacity part of the bubble yet, and won't be for a year or two.

Re: How the AI Bubble Will Pop

#6
post #2

> Some people think artificial intelligence will be the most important technology of the 21st century. I don’t, I think a workable fusion reactor will be the most important technology of the 21st century.

We’ll probably need to innovate one of those to power the immense requirements of AI chatbots.

Re: How the AI Bubble Will Pop

#7
The most frustrating thing to me about this most recent rash of biz guy doubting the future of AI articles is the required mention that AI, specifically an LLM based approach to AGI, is important even if the numbers don't make sense today.

Why is that the case? There's plenty of people in the field who have made convincing arguments that it's a dead end and fundamentally we'll need to do something else to achieve AGI.

Where's the business value? Right now it doesn't really exist, adoption is low to nonexistent outside of programming and even in programming it's inconclusive as to how much better/worse it makes programmers.

I'm not a hater, it could be true, but it seems to be gospel and I'm not sure why.

Mapping to 2001 feels silly to me, when we've had other bubbles in the past that led to nothing of real substance.

LLMs are cool, but if they can't be relied on to do real work maybe they're not change the world cool? More like 30-40B market cool.

EDIT: Just to be clear here. I'm mostly talking about "agents"

It's nice to have something that can function as a good Google replacement especially since regular websites have gotten SEOified over the years. Even better if we have internal Search/Chat or whatever.

I use Glean at work and it's great.

There's some value in summarizing/brainstorming too etc. My point isn't that LLMs et al aren't useful.

The existing value though doesn't justify the multi-trillion dollar buildout plans. What does is the attempt to replace all white collar labor with agents.

That's the world changing part, not running a pretty successful biz, with a useful product. That's the part where I haven't seen meaningful adoption.

This is currently pitched as something that will have nonzero chance of destroying all human life, we can't settle for "Eh it's a bit better than Google and it makes our programmers like 10% more efficient at writing code."

Re: How the AI Bubble Will Pop

#9
Article is behind paywall and is simply saying the same things that people have been saying about the post tech crash.

Now, what this sort of article tends to miss (and I will never know because it’s paywalled like a jackass) is that these models services are used by everyday people for every day tasks. Doesn’t matter if they’re good or not. It enables them to do less work for the same pay. Don’t focus on the money the models are bringing in today, focus on the dependency they’re building on people’s minds.

Re: How the AI Bubble Will Pop

#10
I don't think it'll contract. The people dumping their money into AI think we are at end of days, new order for humanity type point, and they're willing to risk a large part of their fortune to ensure that they remain part of the empowered elite in this new era. It's an all hands on deck thing and only hard diminishing returns that make the AI takeoff story look implausible are going to cause a retrenchment.
Post reply on HN