Dgsh – Directed graph shell
www2.dmst.aueb.gr
Dgsh – Directed graph shell
1–10 of 61 posts
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#2Hello. In English this makes me think of the phrase “dog shit”. Not sure if that’s intentional or not.
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#3This is very interesting, but I'm wondering how it compares to just using a dynamic language like Python or Ruby for the same tasks. Curious how the line count to express the same tasks would come out.
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#4Hello. In English this makes me think of the phrase “dog shit”. Not sure if that’s intentional or not.
Second English speaker here who didn't make that connection at all
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#5Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#6Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#7This is very interesting, but I'm wondering how it compares to just using a dynamic language like Python or Ruby for the same tasks. Curious how the line count to express the same tasks would come out.
There is a lot of stuff for Python which follows the "express computation as a dag" approach, especially Apache Airflow
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#8Hello. In English this makes me think of the phrase “dog shit”. Not sure if that’s intentional or not.
That's what I think when I hear "bash".
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#9Hello. In English this makes me think of the phrase “dog shit”. Not sure if that’s intentional or not.
Now I can't unconnect this, I hope OP was aware because now he wont forget too.
Re: Dgsh – Directed graph shell
#10This would have been great 10-20 years ago, or even at the coining of Unix pipes. By today's standards, however, the syntax feels clunky and dated. I'd like to see contemporary shells like nushell and elvish copy these ideas, with attribution of course, in a more modern way. That is the best way I can see to honor this stagnant project: https://github.com/dspinellis/dgsh