Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code 2.0

npmjs.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 431 posts

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#151

Post by jascha_eng »

scosman wrote: post #142
arjie wrote: post #89

I really like these tools. Yesterday I gave it a filename for a video of my infant daughter eating which I took while I had my phone on the charger. The top of the charger slightly obscured the video. I told it to crop the video to just her and remove the obscured portion and that I had ffmpeg and imagemagick installed and it looked at the video, found the crop dimensions, then ran ffmpeg and I had a video of her all…

Cerebras has OpenAI compatible "Qwen Code" support. ~4000 tokens/s. Qwen code's 480B param model (MoE) that's quite good. Not quite sonnet good, but speed is amazing. https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/introducing-cerebras-code

Cerebras is super cool. I wish OpenAI and Anthropic would have their models hosted there. But I guess supporting yet another platform is hard.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#152

Post by freedomben »

conception wrote: post #133
ashu1461 wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do checkpoints work ?

You can rewind your context back to the checkpoint

That is nice, but it makes me wonder how little people actually know and use git nowadays. This is after all, something git really shines at. Still good to see! (It's not like I can't still just use git for that, which I fully intend to do)

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#153

Post by lupusreal »

epiccoleman wrote: post #141
lupusreal wrote: post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends on the game tbh, having claude ping me for attention every few minutes disrupts most games too much, but with turn-based or casual games it works out well. OpenTTD and Endless Sky are fun to play while claude churns.

I really didn't need the cognitohazard thought that I could play Factorio and still somehow get things done

I'm 10 months clean on factorio, been doing the 12 step program for it. Feeling real tempted to relapse now...

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#154

Post by lupusreal »

freedomben wrote: post #152
conception wrote: post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can rewind your context back to the checkpoint

That is nice, but it makes me wonder how little people actually know and use git nowadays. This is after all, something git really shines at. Still good to see! (It's not like I can't still just use git for that, which I fully intend to do)

For the first few hours of using claude code, I was really excited about finally not being too lazy to commit often because cc would do it for me. But then I hit my pro account limit and I realized that I'd rather spent my tokens writing features instead of commits... I should probably upgrade my account.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#155

Post by ollysb »

The vscode integration does feel far tighter now. The one killer feature that Cursor has over it is the ability to track changes across multiple edits. With Claude you have to either accept or reject the changes after every prompt. With Cursor you can accumulate changes until you're ready to accept. You can use git of course but it isn't anywhere near as ergonomic.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#156

Post by arjie »

scosman wrote: post #142
arjie wrote: post #89

I really like these tools. Yesterday I gave it a filename for a video of my infant daughter eating which I took while I had my phone on the charger. The top of the charger slightly obscured the video. I told it to crop the video to just her and remove the obscured portion and that I had ffmpeg and imagemagick installed and it looked at the video, found the crop dimensions, then ran ffmpeg and I had a video of her all…

Cerebras has OpenAI compatible "Qwen Code" support. ~4000 tokens/s. Qwen code's 480B param model (MoE) that's quite good. Not quite sonnet good, but speed is amazing. https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/introducing-cerebras-code

When they announced this I went to try it and they only work with Cline really (which is what they promote there) but Cline has this VSCode dependency as far as I know and I don't really like that. I have my IDE flow and my CLI flow and I don't want to mix them.

But you're right, they have an OpenAI compatible API https://inference-docs.cerebras.ai/resources/openai so perhaps I can actually use this in the CLI! Thanks for making me take another look.

EDIT: Woah, Charm supports this natively. This is great. I am going to try this now.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#157

Post by arjie »

pimeys wrote: post #118
arjie wrote: post #89

I really like these tools. Yesterday I gave it a filename for a video of my infant daughter eating which I took while I had my phone on the charger. The top of the charger slightly obscured the video. I told it to crop the video to just her and remove the obscured portion and that I had ffmpeg and imagemagick installed and it looked at the video, found the crop dimensions, then ran ffmpeg and I had a video of her all…

You could try to use a router. I'm currently building this: https://github.com/grafbase/nexus/ If croq talks openai API, you enable the anthropic protocol, and openai provider with a base url to croq. Set ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL to the open endpoint and start claude. I haven't tested croq yet, but this could be an interesting use case...

I assumed that OpenRouter wouldn't deliver the same tokens/second which seems to have been a complete mistake. I should have tried it to see. I currently use `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL` and `ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN` with z.ai and it works well but CC 2.0 now displays a warning

      Auth conflict: Both a token (ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN) and an API key (/login managed key) are set. This may lead to unexpected behavior.
    • Trying to use ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN? claude /logout
    • Trying to use /login managed key? Unset the ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN environment variable.
Probably just another flag to find.

EDIT: For anyone coming here from elsewhere, Crush from Charm supports Cerebras/Groq natively!

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#158

Post by gregable »

freedomben wrote: post #152
conception wrote: post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can rewind your context back to the checkpoint

That is nice, but it makes me wonder how little people actually know and use git nowadays. This is after all, something git really shines at. Still good to see! (It's not like I can't still just use git for that, which I fully intend to do)

There's value in rewinding both the code and the prompt to the some point in time.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#159

Post by epiccoleman »

kelnos wrote: post #123
marckrn wrote: post #12

You can find the revamped prompt on github[1], or on twitter summarized by my bot[2]. [1] https://github.com/marckrenn/cc-mvp-prompts/compare/v1.0.128... [2] https://x.com/CCpromptChanges/status/1972709093874757976

> IMPORTANT: DO NOT ADD * ANY** COMMENTS unless asked* Interesting. This was in the old 1.x prompt, removed for 2.0. But CC would pretty much always add comments in 1.x, something I would never request, and would often have to tell it to stop doing (and it would still do it sometimes even after being told to stop).

I can't decide if I like this change or not, tbh. I almost always delete the comments Claude adds, to be sure - but at the same time they seem to provide a sort of utility for me as I read through the generated code. They also act, in a funny way, as a kind of checklist as I review changes - I want them all cleaned up (or maybe edited and left in place) before I PR.

Re: Claude Code 2.0

#160

Post by epiccoleman »

freedomben wrote: post #152
conception wrote: post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can rewind your context back to the checkpoint

That is nice, but it makes me wonder how little people actually know and use git nowadays. This is after all, something git really shines at. Still good to see! (It's not like I can't still just use git for that, which I fully intend to do)

That was my first thought too - but this is subtly different, and rewinds the context too. Actually highly useful, because I have often felt like a bad first pass at a solution poisoned my context with Claude.
Post reply on HN