What are they doing about the supply chain attacks on npm?
The same as everyone else; ignoring it and hope it goes away
Claude Code 2.0
81–90 of 431 posts
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#82> New native VS Code extension Looks great, but it's kind of buggy: - I can't figure out how to toggle thinking - Have to click in the text box to write, not just anywhere in the Claude panel - Have to click to reject edits
It seems they also removed the bypass permission setting...
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#83Well I guess I'll be sticking with opencode.
Do you mind telling us a bit more? I never used OpenCode, what makes it better in your opinion?
I'm consistently hitting weird bugs with opencode, like escape codes not being handled correctly so the tui output looks awful, or it hanging on the first startup. Maybe after they migrate to opentui it'll be better
I do like the model selection with opencode though
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#84You have to specify `/model sonnet[1m]` to get the 1 million context version
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#85Now if only `/rewind` could undo the `rm -rf ~/*` commands and other bone-headed things it tries to do on the filesystem when you're not watching!
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#86You can find the revamped prompt on github[1], or on twitter summarized by my bot[2]. [1] https://github.com/marckrenn/cc-mvp-prompts/compare/v1.0.128... [2] https://x.com/CCpromptChanges/status/1972709093874757976
How are these reliably extracted (hint: they’re not)
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#87It's first time I started get hit by "ERROR Out of memory" in CC - after about an hour of use. I'm on Mac Pro M4 Max with 128 GB RAM...
That's a BIG workstation.
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#88Something I realized about this category of tool (I call them "terminal agents" but that already doesn't work now there's an official VS Code extension for this - maybe just "coding agents" instead) is that they're actually an interesting form of general agent . Claude Code, Codex CLI etc can effectively do anything that a human could do by typing commands into a computer. They're incredibly dangerous to use if you d…
They're only as dangerous as the capabilities you give them. I just created a `codex` and `claude` user on my Linux box and practically always run in yolo mode. I've not had a problem so far. Also, I think shellagent sounds cooler.
That's a great way to run this stuff.
I expect the portion of Claude Code users who have a dedicated user setup like this is pretty tiny!
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#89I really like these tools. Yesterday I gave it a filename for a video of my infant daughter eating which I took while I had my phone on the charger. The top of the charger slightly obscured the video.
I told it to crop the video to just her and remove the obscured portion and that I had ffmpeg and imagemagick installed and it looked at the video, found the crop dimensions, then ran ffmpeg and I had a video of her all cleaned up! Marvelous experience.
My only complaint is that sometimes I want high speed. Unfortunately Cerebras and Groq don't seem to have APIs that are compatible enough for someone to have put them into Charm Crush or anything. But I can't wait for that.
Re: Claude Code 2.0
#90As a burnt-out, laid-off aging developer, I want to thank Anthropic for helping me get in love with programming again. Claude Code on terminal with all my beloved *nix tools and vim rocks.
Agreed, it's actually fun again. The evening hours I used to burn with video games and weed are now spent with claude code, rewriting and finishing up all my custom desktop tools and utilities I started years ago.
I still spend my evening hours like that and do ai-assisted coding in the background