What mail clients do you recommend that make mailing list UI/UX tolerable?
Why use mailing lists?
131–140 of 202 posts
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#132Like I recently wrote in response to someone here who was fascinated that mailing lists were “still a thing in 2025”: Please, inform us of an alternative which is: • Non-proprietary • Federated • Archivable • Accessible • Not dependent on a specific company — https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43972038 >
Maybe Matrix?
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#133Until you start heavily relying on your archive software you use that is accessible over HTTP with links hardcoded in messages. Then you're bound to continue using that software.
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#134Via http://www.mail-archive.com/nginx@nginx.org/msg25495.html . Sadly, it's been announced yesterday that the nginx.org mailing lists are being shutdown by end of month (Sept 2025). P.S. Probably one more reason to look into into the freenginx fork of nginx — https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39373327 — their mailing lists are at http://freenginx.org/en/support.html .
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#135Re: Why use mailing lists?
#136Archives can be searched fairly easily, although admittedly most will be incomplete (hence Deja and Google Groups back in the day).
Some newsgroups are still active, but not many. Why? What went wrong?
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Newsgroups as in NNTP[1] fits those criteria, no? Granted, federated bit is more tricky now. Back in the days many if not most ISPs ran a NNTP server. But the protocol supports it. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_News_Transfer_Protocol
I loved Usenet back in the day, but I sort of wonder why organisations keep their servers running. I struggle to find any active newsgroups these days. Weirdly enough spam still hits some of the groups.
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe Matrix?
I think Matrix is a good upcoming contender. The available clients are not really mature yet though. Element is excessively heavyweight and bloated, being Electron based. Other clients all seem to miss some essential feature or other. And there's no good archiving solution yet.
At the time we had much bigger problems to deal with, so we shelved it and have yet to get back to it.
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#139Like I recently wrote in response to someone here who was fascinated that mailing lists were “still a thing in 2025”: Please, inform us of an alternative which is: • Non-proprietary • Federated • Archivable • Accessible • Not dependent on a specific company — https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43972038 >
Re: Why use mailing lists?
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can run your own mail server and name server on top. The network of mail is very much federated. In mail we have so many freedoms. We have become so locked into technology that we have to introduce a term like “federation” to signify the interoperability and freedom of a single component. Mail is federation layered upon federation. The fact that you can just use a mailings list address as a member of another mail…
> You can run your own mail server and name server on top. The network of mail is very much federated. While I do completely agree with that in theory (and I also love mail) I think it does not stand the reality test because of email deliveravility which tends to be a nightmare. How do you solve this? Do you use a third party SMTP?