Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
1–10 of 55 posts
Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#2Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#3People who run projects get to decide if they have a CoC or not, Raymond isn't the boss of the bazaar or the cathedral.
Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#4Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#5Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#6[flagged]
Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#7Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#8[flagged]
I wasn't aware of his political views, especially more recent statements he's made such as the linked tweet above/below.
Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#9> "If you are more annoying to work with than your contributions justify, you'll be ejected."
is not unreasonable (whether written down or not) for an individual's hobby project, but for something run by a company or other organization I think more detail is required.
The OSI code of conduct seems too general, perhaps open for different interpretations or potentially selective enforcement: https://opensource.org/codeofconduct
The Linux one I prefer, since it's concise and clear, e.g. "sexualized language" and "harassment" are unacceptable: https://docs.kernel.org/process/code-of-conduct.html
My own employer's code of conduct (we have open source projects, discussion forums etc) looks similar to the Linux one. I think it is enforced about once a year, and I think the reason has been either sexual harassment or repeated personal criticism of individuals' work.
Re: Eric S. Raymond to the OSS community on codes of conduct: Refuse to have one
#10I don't like CoCs either, but ironically guys like him make me think they might be needed after all...