Live data from Hacker News

CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

lumafield.com

41–50 of 127 posts

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#41
post #12

I just got a new tenant in my rental house and this time I had to add a clause to the lease enumerating brands of lithium-ion batteries the tenant is allowed to keep on the premises. These things are basically grenades that you can buy for $2 on Temu. Stronger regulations needed.

How is any tenant possibly supposed to comply with that? Rip every piece of electronics they buy apart to check?

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#42
post #4

I find their table of advertised vs actual capacity to be misleadingly negative. They only discharged to 3v. 2.7 could be viewed as more standard. 2.5 is not unheard of. For example, the vapvell 4000 they said was around 3000. They even have a note that says that isn't a reasonable capacity estimate. And yet they still put the percentage and the number. As if they've falsely advertised. However, if you go to vapcell'…

How do you even drain a 3.7V lithium ion battery below 3.3V? My devices that use 18650s will not let them go below that. Is it 3.3V nominal and the actual voltage is lower, like how they’re 4.2V fully charged?

4.2v for 100% SoC (State of Charge, charging), settles down closer to 4v once charging stops (likely not exactly correct, just my rote memory). 80-90% of capacity/SoC is between 3.7-3.8v.

The remaining 10-20% is above 3.8 and below 3.70v. 4.2v is the max to ever intentionally apply to a cell, and 2.5v is the minimum anybody specs as end of discharge.

As such- the "nominal" voltage is 3.7v or 3.8v.

Possibilities for 3.3v cut off include: LEDs' combined forward Voltage, a BMS set to that voltage, high drain applications pulling the voltage below a lower (potentially much lower at 10C to 50C discharge) cutoff voltage.

These are, of course, for NMC lithium secondary/lithium ion cells. NOT LiFePO4/LFP/LTO/Na-ion.

Theres lots of FUD, but most lithium stories are Li-Po cells (cell phones, RAdio-Control, laptops). Of the Li-Po's- most of them are for RC usage without any inbuilt protection.

LiPo's are beat treated like they're ziplock baggies full of 100mL of gasoline. If you handle them, I suggest buying an Ash Pot- their double walls give you a chance of containing a flaming pack. Best to just do it outside though.

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you even drain a 3.7V lithium ion battery below 3.3V? My devices that use 18650s will not let them go below that. Is it 3.3V nominal and the actual voltage is lower, like how they’re 4.2V fully charged?

I guess leave them sitting in a laptop in a barn for a few years. I was given some old shit gateway the other day, tried to charge it, no dice. Ripped the pack apart to find samsung 18650's with approx 0.7V voltage. Against ALL recommendations I put these cells into a MC3000 and they charged up just fine to 4.2V. It does a 0.15A charge per cell until it gets above 3V. Then I had it set to 1.92A bulk charge. Fire exti…

Can't recommend charging cells that have fallen below their official stop voltage- the liability and risk is too high. However, numerous papers have shown that the serious risks happen if they're reverse charged.

I wouldn't use anything but a bench supply stuck outside though.

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#44
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does help. It raise the opportunity to discuss it, which is helpful because not everyone is aware that this is a problem, and like many other lease clauses it is there to assign blame in case an exceptionally bad event comes to pass.

like many other lease clauses it is there to assign blame in case an exceptionally bad event comes to pass That sounds like a job for the insurance company. You do have insurance, right? Did they have any input on this clause?

They dictated it.

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#45
post #10
post #8

After we monitored many battery fires, we decided to build a casing which can sustain lithium fires for typical e-bike batteries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0NXXfCA2CY

That's a great idea. Are you making a product or sharing the build?

https://infinite-battery.com/

(no affiliation)

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#46
post #41
post #12

I just got a new tenant in my rental house and this time I had to add a clause to the lease enumerating brands of lithium-ion batteries the tenant is allowed to keep on the premises. These things are basically grenades that you can buy for $2 on Temu. Stronger regulations needed.

How is any tenant possibly supposed to comply with that? Rip every piece of electronics they buy apart to check?

It's about highly energetic battery packs for things like bicycles and scooters.

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#47
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

like many other lease clauses it is there to assign blame in case an exceptionally bad event comes to pass That sounds like a job for the insurance company. You do have insurance, right? Did they have any input on this clause?

They dictated it.

Interesting, and ominous. If the place burns down and they find the remains of a "TrustFire" battery in the debris, they might try to refuse coverage, leaving you with the task of recovering damages from the tenant. And good luck with that...

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#48
post #22

The conclusion I drew from this is that if real capacity is much less than advertised the battery is best avoided.

Thats a policy to have when buying things in general. Even more so when gram for gram it holds 1% the energy of gasoline... but doesn't need the help of oxygen, or any decernable trigger to make a hash of things.

Re: CT scans of 1k lithium-ion batteries show quality risks in inexpensive cells

#50
post #36

Seems like a good time to highlight this video from Grin Technologies and their experience with ebikes over the years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j92Gt4VviSQ Summary Statement: He summarizes the results of the "sabotaging" attempts by saying, "we just couldn't for the life of ourselves get a nonprotected modern lithium battery to do anything" [02:40:27], in terms of causing a fire. (referring to 18650s) There ar…

It's a long video but one takeaway is to only use cells from the top manufacturers: Samsung, Panasonic, LG and Sony. They are amazingly safe.
Post reply on HN