Live data from Hacker News

Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

reuters.com

71–80 of 809 posts

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#71

Reminder that the UK arrests 12000/year for online posts, by far the most in the West. The UK already has government issued ID, the proof of age card. This is about tying your identity to your online behaviour.

Administrative detections live and well.

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#72
post #53
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I watched the video and the suggestion is that this makes it easier for employers to verify that someone is authorized to work. Is that actually true? Yes. The rules are complex, and currently the government essentially deputizes employers and banks to enforce them; anyone running e.g. a restaurant is having to essentially guess whether a potential employee is in the UK legally or not, on pain of criminal charges i…

> anyone running e.g. a restaurant is having to essentially guess whether a potential employee is in the UK legally or not, on pain of criminal charges if they get it wrong in one direction and discrimination lawsuits if they get it wrong in the other. I don't get this. Is there nothing like some sort of number to register any tax withholding or the like? I imagine that tax authorities and immigration authorities don…

> some sort of number provided by the government

There are countries where each citizen has one unique identifier (Sweden's "personnummer", Denmark's CPR).

The UK is definitely not one of those! [yet]

Instead there are many different identifiers, each for a different purpose, and stored in different systems which almost certainly don't talk to each other.

Just for starters: NHS number for healthcare, National Insurance number for social security and pensions, Unique Taxpayer Reference for tax, Passport (with a number that changes when you renew your passport), Driving licence (with a "number"[alphanumeric] which stays constant even when you renew)...

Multiple overlapping identifiers... and I may have missed some :)

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#73
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back up your claim or stop telling lies.

[flagged]

I don't think anyone denies the existence of immigrants. The disagreement is over the how good they are having it.

Can I see some of these pages please? Let's have a look at the life of an illegal immigrant and see how great it is

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If anything it could help legal immigration. There's a bootstrapping issue where you need a utility bill to open a bank account and a bank account to get paid and get paid to pay the utility bill. And also need all 3 to rent a property to live in. You can choose the right providers to work around that with just your passport, but that involves a bit of work and research. No idea how that would solve anything illegal…

Presumably most legal immigrants already have bank accounts overseas and do not suffer from this bootstrapping issue.

Good luck paying rent/utilities in the UK, or proving a UK address, with a foreign (especially non-SEPA) bank account

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#75
post #53
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I watched the video and the suggestion is that this makes it easier for employers to verify that someone is authorized to work. Is that actually true? Yes. The rules are complex, and currently the government essentially deputizes employers and banks to enforce them; anyone running e.g. a restaurant is having to essentially guess whether a potential employee is in the UK legally or not, on pain of criminal charges i…

> anyone running e.g. a restaurant is having to essentially guess whether a potential employee is in the UK legally or not, on pain of criminal charges if they get it wrong in one direction and discrimination lawsuits if they get it wrong in the other. I don't get this. Is there nothing like some sort of number to register any tax withholding or the like? I imagine that tax authorities and immigration authorities don…

There is a number for this but it’s not tied to your right to work. We have a mash of different systems.

Here’s what employers need to do currently: https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#76

If it's only applicable to citizens then how do they hope it will help on migration? Edit: The Times says this is to include all workers: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/digital-id-comp...

When the cops stop you on the street and ask for your digital ID and you can't show it to them, they'll take you to a deportation center. #PapersPlease

From Wikipedia:

"Tourism in the United Kingdom is a major industry and contributor to the U.K. economy, which is the world's 10th biggest tourist destination, with over 40.1 million visiting in 2019, contributing a total of £234 billion to the GDP"

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#77
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In all fairness, the “immigration” story is likely just a convenient spin on a more realistic goal of state surveillance on it’s own citizens.

While there is almost guaranteed to be an aspect of this, the UK is going through a period where immigration is in the news constantly and the populist party "Reform UK" are on the rise. The Labour government has realised that whatever their own feelings are about people coming to the UK by irregular means and claiming asylum, they need to be seen to recognise the popular narrative right now that the boats must be st…

… except that trying to out-Farage Farage (by being bastards to asylum seekers) will lose them many of their traditional supporters (who are not big on being bastards to asylum seekers) and seems unlikely to gain them many Farage supporters (why would they take some half-hearted populist bastardry when they can have the real deal?).

The ‘small boats’ narrative is ludicrously over-reported here. It’s such a clear case of those with most of the resources scapegoating those with none of the resources as the cause of everyone else’s problems.

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#78
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I don't think anyone denies the existence of immigrants. The disagreement is over the how good they are having it. Can I see some of these pages please? Let's have a look at the life of an illegal immigrant and see how great it is

Just pick a country and start digging. It's not difficult. You can easily find web pages from different government departments, detailing exactly which rights illegal immigrants have, for example when it comes to health care or accommodation. The government web pages usually have links and references to the exact laws which mandate this.

Illegal immigrants, as in people who have been denied asylum and ordered by the immigration authorities to leave the country. Yes, even those have right to many different benefits even though they refuse to leave the country.

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#79
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course a digital id doesn’t prevent illegal immigration. Proper border checks prevent illegal immigration. The digital ids are introduced for other reasons - this is something Tony Blair has been pushing for a long time.

Proper border checks don't do much if people enter the country legally but overstay their visas IDs (along with verification laws) discourage employers from hiring unauthorized immigrants, and without access to gainful employment, many will opt to return to their country of origin, or choose not to come in the first place.

You are describing the current system. Employers can receive business-ending fines (at least in theory) for hiring illegal labour. I’ve never worked a job in the UK that didn’t require me to prove my right to work here, eg by showing them my passport. Digitising the IDs will make no difference.

And frankly, if you believe this is actually about immigration then I’m embarrassed for you. Everyone can see that they’re just using the current crisis an excuse to ram through the unpopular thing that they've wanted for decades.

It won’t stop the boats.

Re: Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers

#80
I didn't watch the video, but have read other reports, and it's worth noting that the context for this is the Labour Party conference, which starts on Sunday. The UK govt are under pressure from the tories and Reform to do something about people entering the UK from France by crossing the channel in small boats. Nothing much seems to be working. So this announcement is about trying to control the narrative by making a big, distracting announcement. I'd mlbe surprised if many people in the government/police/civil service expect it to make a difference.

Also, seems to be intended to be mandatory and require a smartphone. Hows that going to work?

Also, what happens when the database is inevitably stolen?

Post reply on HN