Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
There is no evidence whatsoever that was false flag attack. I didn't expect such blatant conspiracy theories on HN.
Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
21–30 of 894 posts
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#22Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#23[flagged]
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#24Now obviously, this was a lie, but the implication is staggering: Microsoft can't trust it's own employees in Israel, and believes they're lying to the mothership! And if microsoft can't trust them, surely no one else should either!
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#25A little more surveillance might have prevented Oct 7.
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#26There was an interesting point in the earlier article on this, where Microsoft tried to push their Israeli employees under a bus. They claimed their Israeli employees had lied to them about the use of Azure for war and civilian harm because they held more allegiance to their army than to Microsoft. Now obviously, this was a lie, but the implication is staggering: Microsoft can't trust it's own employees in Israel, an…
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#27Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#28[flagged]
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
There is no evidence whatsoever that was false flag attack. I didn't expect such blatant conspiracy theories on HN.
This is something that has been discussed in major Israeli media publications.
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#30“I want to note our appreciation for the reporting of the Guardian,” [Microsoft’s vice-chair and president, Brad Smith] wrote, noting that it had brought to light “information we could not access in light of our customer privacy commitments”. He added: “Our review is ongoing.” Its interesting that they seem to be saying they dont know the full details of how their customers are using Azure, due to privacy commitments…
It could also mean "now that someone else has seen it, we can finally act on what we have only privately seen but couldn't admit seeing"