This leaves remote operation, which just makes no sense at all. The cost of one guy going to a construction site is never going to be more expensive than retrofitting a fleet of excavators with this hardware and building a remote operating center. Additionally these should obviously not be allowed to be used at construction sites, since remote operation in such a dangerous environment adds a totally new layer of hazards. Direct communication between operators, verbally and visually, is extremely important, to operate an excavator safely.
Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
61–70 of 82 posts
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
My car with its drive-by-wire brakes has a brake feedback simulator that gives the driver the kind of feeling associated with power-boosted hydraulic brakes. This is by far the most expensive single component in the car. Arguably these are just expensive accommodations for human flaws. A self-driving car wouldn't need them. Can't the self-driving system act directly on data like pressure, flow, and displacement?
There are no drive-by-wire brakes in the US or Europe for regular cars. Your car's actuator moves the piston that is mechanically linked to your pedal. So even if the electric system fails completely, you can still actuate the brakes.
If there's a failure of the electrical supply to the brake ECU, or another fault condition occurs, various valves then revert to their normally-open or normally-closed positions to allow hydraulic pressure from the pedal through to the brake cylinders, and isolate the stroke simulator.
Because the engine isn't constantly running and providing a vacuum that can be used to assist with brake force, the system also includes a 'brake accumulator' and pump to boost the brake pressure.
Reference: https://pmmonline.co.uk/technical/blue-prints-insight-into-t...
I don't know for certain, but I would assume that other hybrids and EVs have similar systems to maximise regenerative braking.
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#63What a fantastic business. I've watched lots of digger (as we call them here) drivers in action and I'm in awe of what these machines can do and how incredibly skilled their operators are. We have several large rock walls on our property and watching these guys delicately picking and placing huge rocks to key them in just blows my mind. There was a YouTube video recently of an AI-assisted digger making a wall out of…
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#64Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well sure if you are just looking at where the bucket is digging but there is often a dump truck sitting on either your right or left flank waiting for what’s in your bucket (don’t forget the beep button lol). Having a monitor to either side duplicates what you are seeing out of your peripheral vision when operating the real thing. Would make transitioning from real to virtual much easier and imho safer. Yes that is…
I think swinging (which is about 40% of dig and dump workflow by time spent) should not be manual. That's lowest levels of autonomy which requires roughly centering to the pit/truck which we have already achieved. Hence operator only has to look in front! Those workflow numbers come from multiple observations at different sites, one of the examples is this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orEsvu1CS64 I wish to talk t…
It's been over a decade since I last operated an excavator, so grains of salt as usual - but I'd say it should be manual, or at least semi-automated. You need to take care where you unload the bucket on a truck, to avoid its weight distribution being off-center, or to keep various kinds of soil separated on the bed (e.g. we'd load the front with topsoil and fill the rear with the gravel or whatever else was below.
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#66But... I assume you're intending to run on extremely large sites such as highway construction, open pit mines and the likes primarily? Because my experience (if a bit dated cough) is running small 750kg baby excavators under sometimes extreme space constraints - digging trenches for telco in urban and rural areas, which often enough meant having to work with 5-10 cm distance to walls, lighting posts or other infrastructure, and directly next to workers shoving soil into the bucket. Will you add stuff like 360° camera vision, LIDAR etc. to make that safe and help a remote/AI operator, or are you planning on large sites with less danger potential only?
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#67Whats the budget for getting an MVP for heavy equipment ? I ask in all seriousness since, for example, retrofitting regular semis to electric requires millions and millions just to get started
That's because semis - just like cars - are road legal and everything has to be done by the books. The hard part isn't swapping out the engine and mounting a battery pack, car modders have done that for decades for funsies, the hard part is getting it certified for roadworthiness.
On construction sites, particularly ones fully on private property, no one gives a fuck about the equipment, at least not until someone gets hurt, maimed or killed.
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#68The economics of this are nonsensical. The autonomy is not going to happen any time soon, navigating a construction site safely is significantly harder than navigating traffic safely. This leaves remote operation, which just makes no sense at all. The cost of one guy going to a construction site is never going to be more expensive than retrofitting a fleet of excavators with this hardware and building a remote operat…
And last but not least, my car can’t keep lane and can’t drive itself safely in autonomous mode for 50 miles straight on clear day on highway. That’s state of art vision only system in 2025.
The salary of the skilled guy is laughable compared to heavy machinery costs. I was in a quarry on Tuesday. Two guys were operating 7000000€ machinery there, their salary is rounding error in the whole operation. Fuel over the year costs more.
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#69This looks very interesting. I understand that hydraulic retrofit is compelling, but you may want to consider CANbus-based retrofits as well (similar to how CommaAI works, where it simply sends messages to the CANbus network to control steering or speed just like ADAS features do). Modern equipment is moving away from hydraulic controls toward a fully digital cockpit and being able to plug in and teleop (for less tha…
Thanks! Yes we're testing both CAN spoofing and retrofits. CAN spoofing really limits compatibility to a few machines/brands. Would love to get in touch with you: my email is contact ai useflywheel dot ai
So in reality, CANbus control should be no different than hydraulic control to your system - just another style of I/O
Re: Launch HN: Flywheel (YC S25) – Waymo for Excavators
#70> The joysticks are connected to a pilot hydraulic circuit, which proportionally moves the cylinders in the main hydraulic circuit which ultimately moves the excavator joints I've actually spent a decent amount of time running an excavator, as my Dad owns a construction / road building company. It was a great summer job! An important note about the pilot hydraulics is that they _provide feedback to the operator_. I w…
You're right! This is exactly why we like to do mechanical actuation - we are able to achieve bilateral telepresence, which essentially gives the torque (haptic) feedback over the internet! So on small excavators, you can absolutely feel the resistance. We also stream the engine audio, which tells you how hard the hydraulic pump is working. Operators like our system for these reasons :) I'd like to get a chance to ta…
I am curious if something like this is an opportunity for a whole new type of controls and feedback. Since the operator doesn’t have to be in the excavator physically they could take on any position: standing, sitting, lying down, etc. Instead of sending haptic feedback to the joystick it could be sent to a vibrating wrist band. You could hook up the equivalent of a Nintendo Power Glove to have the scoop operated by the operator simulating scooping action. Turning the excavator can be controlled by the operator turning their head and moving it around can be done by the operator walking on an infinite treadmill. Motor strain can be done via color of light or temperature rather than sound. You could have a VR helmet that can also show you a birds eye view from a companion drone, overlay blueprints, show power and water lines, measure depth, etc. I don’t know if it is possible but maybe you could even measure soil composition somehow to show large rocks, soft soil that is dangerous to drive over, inclination angles where the excavator is about to drive, etc.
I imagine skilled operators prefer familiar controls but perhaps there are interesting improvements unlocked by exploring alternatives. It might also fundamentally change how accessible it is for non-professionals to use these machines. I rented an excavator from Home Depot a few years ago to dig a foundation and the learning curve was not shallow. I wonder if a more “natural” interface would help keep people safer.