Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
61–70 of 510 posts
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#62Ladybird is great, but Omarchy is a weird choice. Why can't DHH / Basecamp sponsor David's hobby distro if he wants? The browser ecosystem is dangerously centralized and another independent rendering engine would be welcome. In contrast, I don't see the value in yet another flavor-of-the-week Linux distro. Even sponsoring Arch directly would make more sense here.
Also isn't it just a script to install some stuff and customize
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#63The post does not mention how much money they are giving. Maybe I am a pessimist, but unless the number is in tens of millions or hundreds of millions (very unlikely), I don't think it helps the development of an independent browser very much. Google probably has poured over billions of dollars into Chrome development over the years, and if you look at what Chrome supports, it's massive. I seriously doubt anybody els…
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#64The post does not mention how much money they are giving. Maybe I am a pessimist, but unless the number is in tens of millions or hundreds of millions (very unlikely), I don't think it helps the development of an independent browser very much. Google probably has poured over billions of dollars into Chrome development over the years, and if you look at what Chrome supports, it's massive. I seriously doubt anybody els…
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#65Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#66Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#67I cannot for the life of me understand the Omarchy hype. The Linux community has been theming their distribution installs for decades. What distinguishes this from that?
And it's getting a lot of attention because of DHH. Doesn't look half bad either which helps.
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#68Ladybird is great, but Omarchy is a weird choice. Why can't DHH / Basecamp sponsor David's hobby distro if he wants? The browser ecosystem is dangerously centralized and another independent rendering engine would be welcome. In contrast, I don't see the value in yet another flavor-of-the-week Linux distro. Even sponsoring Arch directly would make more sense here.
I have to say, a single announcement that Cloudflare is sponsoring specifically these two projects does start to look a bit like an attempt to curry favour with the grassroots part of the tech right: give “their guys” some money and praise and maybe they’ll stay off Cloudflare’s back for a bit. And to be clear, that’s not to say that it’s bad to sponsor Ladybird, or maybe even Omarchy.
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#69I’m skeptical. Cloudflare clearly wants to move us to a future where only approved browsers are allowed to access the web. People have been fiercely debating whether that’s a terrible thing, or whether that’s the least bad practical solution on offer for website owners. I don’t want to make a judgement on that, but I don’t think the observation that CF is pushing us in that direction is very controversial. But an ind…
there are a alternative on the market like akamai and fastly
people free to use their favorite cdn over CF lol
Re: Cloudflare is sponsoring Ladybird and Omarchy
#70I cannot for the life of me understand the Omarchy hype. The Linux community has been theming their distribution installs for decades. What distinguishes this from that?
>What distinguishes this from that? More eyes on it, DHH has a big following.