Live data from Hacker News

You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

hackerone.com

81–90 of 571 posts

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The AI is trained on human input. It uses the dash because humans did.

Yeah but a dash, at least on my keyboard is a '-', not the one quoted above.

En and em dashes are easily accessible on both my laptop's and phone's keyboard layouts and I like using them, just like putting the ö in coöperate. It's sad if this now makes me look like a robot and I have to use the wrong dashes to be more "human".

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#82
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI's other acronym...

You do realize English is one of India's two official languages, I hope?

what are they even reffering to, what does AI stand for in relation to India?

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#83

Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…

At some point they told ChatGPT to put emoji's everywhere which is also a dead giveaway on the original report that it's AI. They're the new em dash.

What was it with em dash?

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#85
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You do realize English is one of India's two official languages, I hope?

what are they even reffering to, what does AI stand for in relation to India?

"Actually Indians" was coined to refer to "AI" products which turn out to be outsourced human labor in disguise. Builder.ai was the most infamous example.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#86
post #49

Spent 15 minutes the other day testing a patch I received that claimed to fix a bug (Linux UI bug, not my forte). The “fix” was setting completely fictitious properties. Someone has plugged the GitHub issue into ChatGPT, spat out an untested answer. What’s even the point…

It's all in aid of some streetsweeper being able to add "contributor to X, Y, Z projects!" to their GitHub résumé. Before LLMs were a thing I also received worthless spelling-incorrection pull requests with the same aim.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#87
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're doing it wrong: You should just feed other peoples AI-generated responses into your own AI tools and let the tool answer for you! The loop is then closed, no human time wasted, and the only effect is wasted energy to run the AI tools. It's the perfect business model to turn energy into money.

You joke, but some companies are pushing this idea unironically by putting "use AI to expand a short message into a bloated mess" and "use AI to turn a bloated mess into a brief summary" into both sides of the same product. Good job everyone, we've invented the opposite of data compression.

We could call it “bsencode.
Post reply on HN