Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. Read his postscript: "Is this a speed problem? Are we feeling we have to develop too fast and loose? Is it a quality issue? Have we forgotten the art and science of Software QA? Is it a people problem? Are folks just not passionate about their software enough to fix it? I think it's all of the above. We need to care and we need the collective will to fix it." I.e, he attributes things to lack of: ca…
Plus, the kind of bugs he describes are not that important compared to what we have actually achieved and DOES work. Bingo! This is one perfect example of the problem he's referring to about people not being passionate enough to fix the problems: "Those bugs are not that important." That's a lame excuse. Who cares that we are better than 15 years ago, the point is that we have lots of (seemingly) low-hanging fruit th…
Well, this is my other pet peeve, people not understanding the notion of "opportunity cost".
>the point is that we have lots of (seemingly) low-hanging fruit that stays there for plenty of releases
The key word here is "seemingly".
Do you really think that the guys as Apple/Google that pull all-nighters and work themselves to death to finish iOS/Android don't have "enough passion to fix problems"?
Or do you believe that if they took their sweet time they would have fixed every "low hanging fruit"? Even a low hanging fruit can add a couple of days to a month to a project, or delay other, more important features and/or fixes.
"Go attack all the low hanging fruits" is a meaningless proposition. Some projects you use are open source. Why don't YOU go attack them? Who is gonna make those "low hanging fruit" interesting for a volunteer to work? Who is gonna make them profitable for a for profit company, so that it doesn't die in the market while fixing them?
Mozilla tried to build a better browser. They addressed all the low and high hanging fruits.
What happened?
It took them 5 years to ship something that worked kinda OK, by which time the company had died, and the market share went to IE. And even those releases 5 years after the new code started had lots of problems. Eventually they betted on the more minimal Firefox instead of ever perfecting the full blown Mozilla browser/suite. And it's still not perfect.
Result? Besides the parent company dying, they haven't got that old high Netscape market share back even now.
>Who cares that we are better than 15 years ago
I, for one, do.