This post has the same issues as NotebookLM for me -- overdesigned, overengineered for what at its core is a simple and valuable UX. NotebookLM: obviously useful, but I just wanna select some files and chat w/ them or have them summarized for me. It's got low info density, way too many cards/buttons/sections/icons, and it makes the core UX really difficult for me to navigate. This post: I wanted to know what cool tho…
Really disliked the author's tone: "me, me, me, me, me, me. Also somebody promote me." All this paragraphs telling us what a great job he's done and this charlatan's product (with great potential)...doesn't even save your chats. So you start discussing about something in your notes, come back and...the messages are gone. But sure come tell me what a genius you are with your 3 column layout. Charlatans, and those peop…
Designing NotebookLM
81–90 of 91 posts
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not too negative, I really appreciate this perspective and agree with some of what you said. IMO if you wanted to simply talk to a file or two Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude are great for that. The goal of this experimental product was to think creatively around what a true source grounded tool could be. (Obviously while building to best support the user needs). Our team put in immense work to move quickly while trying…
Thank you for your work. NotebookLM has been invaluable for my learning experience. With the summaries, the mind maps, the multi-source synthesis and dialogue with the material, it adjusts pretty well to my learning style.
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#83I don't care much for NotebookLM's UX. I find the layout confusing, the concepts conveyed in the UI not very intuitive. I feel like the power of what's under the hood doesn't translate very well into the frontend. That said, this article was a very nice overview. Clean page, interesting to see his perspective. He clearly took tare and thought about the project. I don't agree with his conclusions and results, but that…
Do you use an alternative? I haven't explored the space much.
I'm going in a fairly different direction to all the ones I've seen (including NBLM) because I am going workflow-first for my workflow.
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#84Pretty awful UX to be honest. Credit goes to the backend engineers who made this happen.
Took me ages to figure out you can copy paste simple text. Editing any text isn't great either.
Why isn't there a dedicated markdown notes section with folder and files? Most of us won't have ready to use PDFs but almost all of know how to use a text editor and paste text into it. Your Notes app UI is without proper support for editing and maintaining notes.
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#85This post has the same issues as NotebookLM for me -- overdesigned, overengineered for what at its core is a simple and valuable UX. NotebookLM: obviously useful, but I just wanna select some files and chat w/ them or have them summarized for me. It's got low info density, way too many cards/buttons/sections/icons, and it makes the core UX really difficult for me to navigate. This post: I wanted to know what cool tho…
Not too negative, I really appreciate this perspective and agree with some of what you said. IMO if you wanted to simply talk to a file or two Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude are great for that. The goal of this experimental product was to think creatively around what a true source grounded tool could be. (Obviously while building to best support the user needs). Our team put in immense work to move quickly while trying…
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#86This post has the same issues as NotebookLM for me -- overdesigned, overengineered for what at its core is a simple and valuable UX. NotebookLM: obviously useful, but I just wanna select some files and chat w/ them or have them summarized for me. It's got low info density, way too many cards/buttons/sections/icons, and it makes the core UX really difficult for me to navigate. This post: I wanted to know what cool tho…
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#87This post has the same issues as NotebookLM for me -- overdesigned, overengineered for what at its core is a simple and valuable UX. NotebookLM: obviously useful, but I just wanna select some files and chat w/ them or have them summarized for me. It's got low info density, way too many cards/buttons/sections/icons, and it makes the core UX really difficult for me to navigate. This post: I wanted to know what cool tho…
Endless scrolling just to describe a three-panel layout, something that's been around since the 80s (?).
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really disliked the author's tone: "me, me, me, me, me, me. Also somebody promote me." All this paragraphs telling us what a great job he's done and this charlatan's product (with great potential)...doesn't even save your chats. So you start discussing about something in your notes, come back and...the messages are gone. But sure come tell me what a genius you are with your 3 column layout. Charlatans, and those peop…
And the, "I ran off paper and the final design was the one I created on a napkin", was just too cliche and overly dramatic.
Re: Designing NotebookLM
#89I've been working on my own knowledge management app to help small businesses with high part-time and employee turnover to manage FAQs and centralize local expertise. I think the 3-pane with the chat in the middle is a really clean way of making a whole library knowledge repository easily accessible, especially for someone wanting to avoid minimize clicks or as you say 'tab-overwhelm'.