Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The unstated reason for this change was that many of the existing Rubygems maintainers have recently quit (including their only full-time engineer) due to their continued relationship with DHH. Can someone expand on what this means? Is it a continued relationship between Ruby Central and DHH, or the maintainers and DHH? Why does the other party have a problem with that? EDIT: It seems the post was clarified since I…
[flagged]
Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
101–110 of 286 posts
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#102Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The unstated reason for this change was that many of the existing Rubygems maintainers have recently quit (including their only full-time engineer) due to their continued relationship with DHH. Can someone expand on what this means? Is it a continued relationship between Ruby Central and DHH, or the maintainers and DHH? Why does the other party have a problem with that? EDIT: It seems the post was clarified since I…
[flagged]
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#104[1]: https://old.reddit.com/r/ruby/comments/1nkzszc/ruby_centrals...
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#105Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The unstated reason for this change was that many of the existing Rubygems maintainers have recently quit (including their only full-time engineer) due to their continued relationship with DHH. Can someone expand on what this means? Is it a continued relationship between Ruby Central and DHH, or the maintainers and DHH? Why does the other party have a problem with that? EDIT: It seems the post was clarified since I…
[flagged]
> In 2000, more than sixty percent of the city were native Brits. By 2024, that had dropped to about a third.
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The unstated reason for this change was that many of the existing Rubygems maintainers have recently quit (including their only full-time engineer) due to their continued relationship with DHH. Can someone expand on what this means? Is it a continued relationship between Ruby Central and DHH, or the maintainers and DHH? Why does the other party have a problem with that? EDIT: It seems the post was clarified since I…
[flagged]
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
He then uses a statistic that "only a third" are native brits in 2021, which roughly lines up with the "White British" line in the chart.
You can argue that "white supremecist" is a charged and problematic term, but I'd say that "Here he complains about too many brown people in London." is a fairly accurate representation of the article. I'd say "disgraceful slander" is a bit too strong as a rebuttal.
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
In the linked article, DHH links out to a wikipedia article titled "Ethnic groups in London"[0]. He then uses a statistic that "only a third" are native brits in 2021, which roughly lines up with the "White British" line in the chart. You can argue that "white supremecist" is a charged and problematic term, but I'd say that "Here he complains about too many brown people in London." is a fairly accurate representation…
Re: Ruby Central's Attack on RubyGems [pdf]
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The unstated reason for this change was that many of the existing Rubygems maintainers have recently quit (including their only full-time engineer) due to their continued relationship with DHH. Can someone expand on what this means? Is it a continued relationship between Ruby Central and DHH, or the maintainers and DHH? Why does the other party have a problem with that? EDIT: It seems the post was clarified since I…
[flagged]