90% of the world's population and 68% of the land mass being in the northen hemisphere is probably a good enough reason to put north up top on a map.
Your map should be bottom-heavy for stability.
81–90 of 540 posts
90% of the world's population and 68% of the land mass being in the northen hemisphere is probably a good enough reason to put north up top on a map.
Your map should be bottom-heavy for stability.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_North_and_Global_South
First time seeing this and it feels so offensive. I'm somewhat okay with the term developed and developing countries, though not too much [1]. But this just feels discriminatory. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factfulness
What do you mean by discriminatory?
As someone from the Southern Hemisphere, the article's point falls flat. There's more land area in the top so it makes it easier to look at it
I bought a similar map from a shop in Australia and thought it was a really cool way to look at things from a different perspective. Perhaps un-surprisingly, it has Australa front and centre. https://hemamaps.com/products/upside-down-world-in-envelope-...
It was going to be north or south, thanks to the widespread existence of the magnetic compass at the time, and the printing press was invented by people in the north.
Fun fact: if you rotate a regular map (north on top) counterclockwise, you’ll notice the American continent looks like a duck. Even more fun fact: once you’ve seen this, you cannot unsee it. It’s a duck.
Relatedly there's a Map Men video on why north is up. [0] I don't buy the whole top is 'good' and lower is 'bad'. I think the bias is just a lot of the groups that made maps were located north(ish) and traveling roughly southward which made it a convenient orientation, especially during the age of sail. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B14Gtm2Z_70