Live data from Hacker News

ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

cnn.com

331–340 of 1001 posts

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#331

I am largely neutral on this particular assassination, as I knew almost nothing about Mr. Kirk prior to his departure (just name recognition & basic political associations). But I do think, after decades of reflection, that comedians are correct when they point out that stereotypical humor shouldn't be off limits to any performer (of any background/color), but is... e.g. Owen Benjamin, Chappelle, Seinfeld .

[deleted]

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#332
post #257

What causes very active discussions like this to drop off the front page so quickly? I saw another newer post that was probably made because the poster didn't see this post, and a comment made in there linked to this discussion.

> What causes very active discussions like this to drop off the front page so quickly? Supposedly posts with very high comments/upvote ratio are automatically classified as toxic and downranked. That combined with random users flagging it, presumably. In any case, seems more algorithmic than editorial (which is not to say that the latter never occurs around here in general)

Actually fascinating to really think of it as the inverse of what most social media platforms do these days, which is the opposite.

HNs is a fairly typical "lock threads that degrade to flamewars" strategy that i first encountered more than 20 years ago.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#333

[flagged]

You're saying the left is more radicalized than the right? The stats don't pan out: https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.c... Are you just going to ignore stuff like, I don't know, January 6th? When has the left done ANYTHING approaching what Trump and his followers did there? Trump himself has made COUNTLESS violent remarks himself: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-v..…

[flagged]

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#334
post #241

I expected Kimmel to have somehow criticized Kirk, a dubious enough reason to pull the show. But this isn’t even that. Comments quoted in stories assert that the shooter was MAGA - maybe that’s somewhat controversial, but it’s ludicrous to suggest it’s offensive. That paired with comments criticizing the Dear Leader were enough. This is a new low in corporate cowardice toward Trump bullying. Terrible precedent aside,…

Is it possible that they wanted to pull the show and this was just the excuse they were looking for?

Unlikely they’d want to politicize the canceling of their show. Quiet and uncontroversial is better for ABC.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> In this case, it is the FCC, an arm of the government, that is pressuring ABC to do this rather than other private citizens. Actually it was a couple of big ABC affiliate owners that started the avalanche, and ABC followed…not any government pressure. You can certainly speculate that the these affiliates had an ulterior motive in their actions to curry favor with the Trump administration, but it’s not unreasonable…

> Actually it was a couple of big ABC affiliate owners that started the avalanche, and ABC followed…not any government pressure.

Brah.

Brendan Carr, the current head of the FCC publicly threatened to go after ABC for his speech, then ABC pulled the show.[1] Walks, talks, and acts likes government pressure being used for censorship against views they don’t agree with

[1] https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fcc-chair-threatens-jimm...

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

I mean, yes? You're not violating the 4th. We have plenty of other laws, including laws against trespassing, that might apply here.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#337

I expected Kimmel to have somehow criticized Kirk, a dubious enough reason to pull the show. But this isn’t even that. Comments quoted in stories assert that the shooter was MAGA - maybe that’s somewhat controversial, but it’s ludicrous to suggest it’s offensive. That paired with comments criticizing the Dear Leader were enough. This is a new low in corporate cowardice toward Trump bullying.

It's extremely relevant. The person grew up "conservative" and was radicalized to the left in college. The reason this is important is that it's a trend. If the trend isn't acknowledged on the left, then it will just continue.

How does a semester of a very conservative college radicalize him? You sound like you are just parroting MAGA talking points.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#338
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We’re trying but the lower courts keep getting overruled by a corrupt Supreme Court.

It's a tough one, even without the Supreme Court issues, Kimmel alone is circumstantial at best; sure, the current POTUS is on record saying that Kimmel would be next to get the chop, but that proves nothing- any actual action taken would, I assume, be just pressure with no paper trail - classic intimidation leverage made famous by Scorsese.

The FCC Chairman specifically threatened to pull ABC broadcasting licenses if they didn't punish Kimmel. That isn't circumstantial at all. That's a smoking gun.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What clip and what was insane?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxqLXndjvQY

There's nothing in the clip, that the YouTuber didn't up and spin it all right around, replacing the use of Kimmel's term "Maga Gang" with "the Left" instead.

Re: ABC yanks Jimmy Kimmel’s show ‘indefinitely’ after threat from FCC chair

#340

I've seen a large number of comments online saying the shooter was a trump supporter - I don't really understand where that information comes from. I feel like this is the sort of thing a prediction market might be able sort out.

[flagged]

My bias in these cases is that the simplest answer, same as any mass shooting, is that the killers motivations are a manifestation of mental illness and nothing more. Not always true but typically so; wasnt the trump would be assassin not left for instance? When i was told that i wasnt surprised, not because i think it was more likely of someone on the right, but because i think its mostly random. Eg we have a gun culture, a toxic culture, and a lack of mental health institutions culture. That will only ever produce (among other things) a consistent stream of random acts of violence.

In this particular case i am a little more curious than usual to find out if that holds up here if only because the narrative was so immediately anti left attacks.

Post reply on HN