Live data from Hacker News

So long, Retina

blog.rinik.net

21–30 of 76 posts

Re: So long, Retina

#21
post #11

"I got rid of my retina macbook pro today." While I can understand the issue being something that annoys you, deciding to simply rid yourself of it - despite the bug being as you state "not something that disturbs your normal workflow" - strikes me as rather silly.

Only one of his 5 points were "not something that disturbs your normal workflow."

Re: So long, Retina

#22
post #9

It works best with 1440x900 resolution. So if you like 1680x1050, your GPU will have to do extra work. The display's native resolution is 2880x1800. Why would you set it to half the native resolution? That defeats the whole point of having all those pixels! You might as well have a 1440x900 (non-retina) display. Setting the display output to 1680x1050 is totally whacked - that is displaying each pixel in 1.7 native p…

Relative resolutions. "By default, the new MacBook Pro ships in a pixel-doubled configuration, meaning you actually get an equivalent to a 1440-by-900-pixel resolution. This offers no actual increase in desktop space over that of the current standard non-retina MacBook Pro, but the increased pixel density means that items onscreen can appear much sharper than they did before." [1]

The point of having the pixels is so that stuff looks sharper. 1680x1050 is a lot more screen real estate = more job for the windowing system to display everything nicely. Same thing for running it at full 2880x1800 resolution.

[1] http://www.techhive.com/article/257796/run_a_retina_macbook_...

Re: So long, Retina

#24
post #9

It works best with 1440x900 resolution. So if you like 1680x1050, your GPU will have to do extra work. The display's native resolution is 2880x1800. Why would you set it to half the native resolution? That defeats the whole point of having all those pixels! You might as well have a 1440x900 (non-retina) display. Setting the display output to 1680x1050 is totally whacked - that is displaying each pixel in 1.7 native p…

1680x1050 looks fine to my eyes. Certainly not retina quality, but as good as a non-retina display.

1680x1050, 1080p and etc, are unacceptable for graphical work. You can notice blurring. Only 1440x900 or the native 2880x1800 are, in my opinion.

I run the native 2880x1800 at work and an external 1080p screen at home. I've noticed none of these issues so far. Maybe I'm one of the lucky ones.

Re: So long, Retina

#25
post #13

Wow, that's kind of petty. The author is never going to find the perfect laptop. There are always going to be some issues, so deal with it. While I am always in favor of throwing out apple products (apple sucks), this article is just stupid.

How is it petty? He stated multiple valid reasons why he decided to switch laptops on his personal blog. Nothing petty about them either, I can imagine jittery scrolling being very annoying/disruptive to some people.

Re: So long, Retina

#26
post #8

Have the retina. It's an awesome machine, and his points are correct: * A lot of them suffer from burn-in, mine doesn't (I have a samsung display). I'm lucky! * The scrolling is jittery at times. Yes I do notice. * You can't really update anything inside. None of these things bother me, at all. Update things inside? Last time I did that was to upgrade a 2GB to a 4GB for my previous laptop. It cost me as much as my Ap…

Honestly to me, burn in seems completely unacceptable for a computer so expensive.

Re: So long, Retina

#27
post #8

Have the retina. It's an awesome machine, and his points are correct: * A lot of them suffer from burn-in, mine doesn't (I have a samsung display). I'm lucky! * The scrolling is jittery at times. Yes I do notice. * You can't really update anything inside. None of these things bother me, at all. Update things inside? Last time I did that was to upgrade a 2GB to a 4GB for my previous laptop. It cost me as much as my Ap…

I had the image persistence ("burn-in") problem with my first-gen iPad. I took it to the Apple store, they replaced it, and the replacement suffered from it as well. Upon my second return, I was informed such behavior was within performance specifications for the panel and it would not be replaced.

I'm going to guess you get a similar one-chance swap-out with the Retina MBP as well.

Re: So long, Retina

#28

I have one of these I haven't noticed any of those problems you mentioned but I do have 1 dead pixel that is starting to drive me nuts. Anyone else notice any dead pixels on theirs? Other then that I love it, fastest most beautiful machine I've ever used.

Is it 1, or 4? If it's 3 or more, I think Apple will replace it for you (for free).

Re: So long, Retina

#29

"After a couple of days" he noticed that "it's a disposable machine" and "none of its components can be upgraded"? Those are valid complaints, but they're public knowledge. If he didn't do the research before buying it, it's a little silly to be complaining about those two things now.

You should give the full quote. "Started noticing some of the well known problems" implies that he did know about them, just didn't notice the negatives of them himself the first couple of days.

Lots of hate on HN for this article...

Re: So long, Retina

#30
post #11

"I got rid of my retina macbook pro today." While I can understand the issue being something that annoys you, deciding to simply rid yourself of it - despite the bug being as you state "not something that disturbs your normal workflow" - strikes me as rather silly.

He presumably returned it, getting his money back. It's not silly, maybe he just felt it wasn't worth the premium.
Post reply on HN