Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

PureVPN IPv6 Leak

anagogistis.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 93 posts

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#31

Post by bitxbitxbitcoin »

ffsm8 wrote: post #28
ramon156 wrote: post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Solid dev + OSS ecosystem + Flat rates I'm satisfied!

$5/month vs eg $2/month with a long running sub with e.g. PIA (Chinese owners) though... I wish mullvad provided long running subs with better prices then what they currently provide.

Would love a source for Chinese owners of PIA. Last I knew, it was Israeli owners.

-source, former employee.

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#33

Post by bitxbitxbitcoin »

lxgr wrote: post #25
rasengan wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VP.NET doesn't require any trust at all [1][2]. [1] https://vp.net/l/en-US/blog/Don%27t-Trust-Verify [2] I work for VP.NET and can answer any questions regarding the technology as well!

Interesting! But "no trust required" is a strong statement; don't I need to trust at least Intel? :)

My advice is never to trust bad intel ;).

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#34

Post by baobun »

ffsm8 wrote: post #28
ramon156 wrote: post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Solid dev + OSS ecosystem + Flat rates I'm satisfied!

$5/month vs eg $2/month with a long running sub with e.g. PIA (Chinese owners) though... I wish mullvad provided long running subs with better prices then what they currently provide.

"sub" as in subsidized by your data eh?

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#35

Post by baobun »

xkcd1963 wrote: post #22

What about NordVPN and ExpressVPN are those somewhat trustworthy?

It boggles me how one can see them as anything but sus after tops 30 minutes of looking into it. You get that all those "top 5 vpn" sites and youtube recs are sponsored, right?

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#37

Post by patrakov »

Denatonium wrote: post #17

For the love of God, don't use PureVPN ! They have been proven in court to log traffic, despite claiming not to.[1] [1] https://cyberinsider.com/vpn-logs-lies/

They are one of the few VPN providers that give out public IPv4 addresses, and you can even get a static one. So, if you are using them for having a public IP, not for privacy, please continue doing so.

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#38

Post by c420 »

bitxbitxbitcoin wrote: post #31
ffsm8 wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$5/month vs eg $2/month with a long running sub with e.g. PIA (Chinese owners) though... I wish mullvad provided long running subs with better prices then what they currently provide.

Would love a source for Chinese owners of PIA. Last I knew, it was Israeli owners. -source, former employee.

You are correct: "Kape Technologies is a United Kingdom-based cybersecurity software company. Kape owns VPN services and cybersecurity tools, including CyberGhost, Private Internet Access (PIA), ZenMate, ExpressVPN, and Intego."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_Sagi#Kape_Technologies

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#39

Post by lxgr »

pshirshov wrote: post #16

I donwt know any single VPN provider apart from Mullvad with proper v6 implementation.

Do you know if it's supported using OS-native VPN client implementations as well (i.e. Wirecard, IKEv2, or maybe OpenVPN), or only using their official client?

Re: PureVPN IPv6 Leak

#40

Post by sva_ »

lxgr wrote: post #39
pshirshov wrote: post #16

I donwt know any single VPN provider apart from Mullvad with proper v6 implementation.

Do you know if it's supported using OS-native VPN client implementations as well (i.e. Wirecard, IKEv2, or maybe OpenVPN), or only using their official client?

You can download the WireGuard/OpenVPN config files all at once in their web interface.
Post reply on HN