Live data from Hacker News

Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

reddit.com

211–220 of 397 posts

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. He wasn't convicted of a cannabis offense. He was convicted of a fairly grave computer fraud/abuse claim, and part of the contract of his early release from federal custody was a set of terms that included monitoring and sobriety. He allegedly violated those terms, and you stipulate those violations here. Like any parolee, he's being put back into custody.

Why is that added, there's an agenda there. Why does "sobriety" matter in a computer crime? This is oppression and this (plus the other conditions) simple set up people like this for a fall.

Not a fan of this kind of thing, and I think that weed should be legal, but don't forget that federally, it is still illegal, and "don't do illegal stuff while out on parole" at least has a pretty basic logic to it.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#212
post #73

Interesting, Trump administration pardoned Ross William Ulbricht who run drug dealing business specifically because it was done behind Tor using cryptocurrency. So this was a one off? This sounds awful lot like Middle Eastern mafia stuff, where it's technically illegal to do some things but you can do a lot of things if you are aligned with the people in power. I have no idea what this person was up to but this selec…

> Interesting, Trump administration pardoned Ross William Ulbricht who run drug dealing business specifically because it was done behind Tor using cryptocurrency. So this was a one off? Didn't Ulbricht get pardoned for being a hero of the cryptocurrency-bros, as kind of a deal to get support from the Libertarians in the election? I think he was a one-off, or at least part of a small category that doesn't extend to cr…

He still did a decade in the slammer. I think his sentence was excessive, since he never directly harmed anyone.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#213
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This always happens though. Every time someone is thrown in a cage unjustly, the state tries to redirect us (yes, us, here in this forum and others like it) to look at other details of the situation, whether it's details of the person's political or personality or, in this case, details of this (also seemingly unjust) probation violation. Who cares if he smoked weed or installed a VM or evaded a government keylogger?…

You care if he was a pedo? Go check page 28, lines 3 to 8 on https://rockenhaus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/U.S.-v.-Ro...

Summary: He was logged doing a search for the "North American Man/Boy Love Association", and then after downloaded some kind of VM access/TOR software the logging ended.

I'm surprised this isn't mentioned much here, there's a lot of reddit comments that picked up on this and the OP (self-identified as the wife) isn't replying to any, only the ones that fit her story.

https://old.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/1ni5drm/the_fbi_couldn...

The OP here also downplays a lot of what the husband did. He was on probation from DDOSing and then physically damaging company equipment after he was fired. Then on probation from that he smoked weed, ghosted his probation officer, broke the terms.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#214
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can attest as a personal experience in the past that this kind of behavior is not uncommon with feds, and has happened even before the current administration One the first comments on reddit was actually: > … in trump's america lmao Someone had to awkwardly point out it was biden’s america. Which makes it easier and saves keystrokes: it’s just “america, lmao”. Then other countries can be even worse so it’s “lmao”…

The wife’s description of the charges is not honest. See all of the other comments which revealed a much longer list of offenses he committed. The Reddit post is an attempt to garner sympathy by leaving out all of the actual crimes committed.

> The wife’s description of the charges is not honest. See all of the other comments which revealed a much longer list of offenses he committed.

Yeah, good point. That happens sometimes. It's sad, people just see reddit as sort of a platform of gullible people. I was just pointing out reddit's reaction, mainly.

Then my other reply was in reply to GP's own story ("clear hacking tools" = CCleaner).

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#215
post #44
post #25

[flagged]

Guilt by association is much more a social construct, than a legal one. The bar for legal consequences is expected to be much higher than mere association. It has never been perfect, nor uniformly applied in all circumstances, but it is and should remain a nominal goal of the justice system. For that to no longer be considered the case, even in a casual conversation like this, is a devastating shift of the Overton wi…

>Guilt by association is much more a social construct, than a legal one.

Turning this sentence up and down, and still fail to get what it tries to convey. Law is social construct per definition, isn’t it?

>It has never been perfect, nor uniformly applied in all circumstances, but it is and should remain a nominal goal of the justice system.

No? Like, at best it is just going to pretend to be so. Then it’s actually all ruled by ambitious sociopath manipulators that take The Prince as bedtime reading, either right from the start or as soon as they can unleash their master plan.

Can anyone point to any jurisdiction in the world which puts equal duties and rights with actual associated material/logistical means on every single citizen? If no, we might be free to conclude that justice and equality are words on frontispiece of the theater, not how the leviathan is planning to actually process.

All that said, not everyone is Aaron Schwartz. Even supposing it’s only to maintain the façade, institutions do also have to act against some criminal outside of their own ruling castes.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#216
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's unsettling how quickly things are escalating.

Nothing about this was quick. 2015 was the first time we had an increase in authoritarianism in the public debate. Project 2025 was announced in 2023.

Fair point. Just noting that we're in the middle of a blitz.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As someone who works in this industry: we do ECU modification and repair and as such, have regular contact with the EPA. Our products all align with all required emissions regulation and testing, which is why we're allowed to continue selling them. If the EPA says jump, we ask how high. I say this because this cultural vibe of government agencies kicking in your door for doing innocuous shit needs to die already, tha…

You, you are an instance of the problem. For any given issue, subject, industry or niche there is always a you. And you are the enablers. Multiply by every equivalent idiot and niche and that's how you get the world in which some guy gets whacked for running a tor node. If not that it would be some other niche, maybe some guy importing gray market power equipment to the chagrin of the branded dealers would be getting…

> For any given issue, subject, industry or niche there is always a you. And you are the enablers. Multiply by every equivalent idiot and niche and that's how you get the world in which some guy gets whacked for running a tor node.

I am not defending at all the actions of the FBI. The FBI/CIA/NSA are overzealous law enforcement serving the will of colonial capitalism. Their history of targeting whistleblowers, activists, and technologists; like, for example, the guy running a Tor node; is well documented and deeply problematic. That same machinery has also been deployed against environmental activists, which makes the irony even more bitter that it's being cited here.

I'm defending the EPA, which in contrast, works with numerous industries, including ours, to benefit society as a whole.

The problem is this exact mindset where we insist that everything is on one massive slippery slope and there's simply no way to differentiate from proper, needed regulation, and the boot of law enforcement being deployed to fuck with the working class at scale.

We can tell the difference and it isn't difficult, it simply requires thinking which an unfortunate number of voters don't like doing.

> "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it"

Completely backwards. There is a LOT of money to be made circumventing emissions regulations, which is why almost every OEM has been caught with their hands in that particular cookie jar, either fingernail or wrist deep.

We COST ourselves money locking up those features because we agree with the regulations in place.

> A bunch of reactionary yokels are a symptom of the degree to which your ilk has undermined the legitimacy of the laws they violate and enforcement agencies they thumb their nose at, not the root cause. If society solves people like you the yokels will mostly go away on their own. That is what I seek.

Reactionary movements have existed for every time the Government says don't do anything since time immemorial. There is ALWAYS reactionaries because there is ALWAYS a segment of the population that never matures past the age of ten. The fact that they occasionally have a point is nothing but statistical likelihood; if you constantly say "no" to everything, by sheer chance, you will occasionally say no to something bad.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#218
post #125
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This always happens though. Every time someone is thrown in a cage unjustly, the state tries to redirect us (yes, us, here in this forum and others like it) to look at other details of the situation, whether it's details of the person's political or personality or, in this case, details of this (also seemingly unjust) probation violation. Who cares if he smoked weed or installed a VM or evaded a government keylogger?…

> the state tries to redirect us (yes, us, here in this forum and others like it) to look at other details of the situation Isn't the reddit post doing the same thing by trying to imply he was jailed for running a TOR node when he was officially jailed for breaking parole terms? Even if they think those were just excuse to jail him, the refusal to acknowledge those details makes the account at least deceptive.

Well yes, I do agree with this. I wish people were more up front in these situations. But it's not easy because the waters are so muddied. But yeah, you're absolutely right (typing that phrase now makes me feel like an LLM).

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#219
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This always happens though. Every time someone is thrown in a cage unjustly, the state tries to redirect us (yes, us, here in this forum and others like it) to look at other details of the situation, whether it's details of the person's political or personality or, in this case, details of this (also seemingly unjust) probation violation. Who cares if he smoked weed or installed a VM or evaded a government keylogger?…

You care if he was a pedo? Go check page 28, lines 3 to 8 on https://rockenhaus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/U.S.-v.-Ro...

Well of course. So try him on that.

Re: Man jailed for parole violations after refusing to decrypt his Tor node

#220
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If all of that is true, then that is a very serious CFAA charge. It makes sense that they would want to downplay it as "minor" and "not relevant". It sounds like the parole violations came later? In any case, thank you for researching. There is always more to the story.

Weev 'violated' the CFAA for incrementing a GET request, with his overturned conviction only for wrong jurisdiction. So the government has put us in a position where it's hard to take the CFAA seriously. We also know from prosecutions in other statutes that the government will often prosecute a a broad crime with many separate sub-definitions of the various way you can break it, then refuse to tell you under which su…

> his overturned conviction only for wrong jurisdiction

What are you getting at?

If an appeals court says “wrong jurisdiction”, that’s an “rm -rf” on the whole entire case. There’s nothing left to argue about.

Post reply on HN