I feel like this article would be much more approachable if it didn't assume readers already know Ocaml and Haskell and their module system
Death to type classes
11–20 of 78 posts
Re: Death to type classes
#12Re: Death to type classes
#13[flagged]
Re: Death to type classes
#14I feel like this article would be much more approachable if it didn't assume readers already know Ocaml and Haskell and their module system
Re: Death to type classes
#15And I wouldn't be surprised if there were more retired left handed surgeons in their 50s living in rural Switzerland than people who understand what he's talking about.
Re: Death to type classes
#16[flagged]
Re: Death to type classes
#17if err !== nil { return err }
Re: Death to type classes
#18I feel like this article would be much more approachable if it didn't assume readers already know Ocaml and Haskell and their module system
Indeed so, but that would require a few months worth of work from the reader, unfortunately. (I have a t-shirt with a lambda in a circle, reminiscent of the anarchist emblem, and words "no class, no state". It's definitely possible to explain to a passer-by who never studied FP what it refers to, but not in such a way that the joke remained funny. Possibly the same deal is with the bumper sticker saying "my other car…
How often do people think you're a Half-Life fan instead?
Re: Death to type classes
#19[flagged]
Re: Death to type classes
#20[flagged]