Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This debate style is pretty frustrating to me. Use a talking point for the other side and act like it is why the reason it the decision is made. It really does not lend itself to getting to the root of issues and finding what compromise is. In my opinion this added nothing to the conversation when in theory the op asked for a real answer.
Whenever they propose something, just ask yourself which lobbyist stands something to gain. That will be a sufficient explanation.