Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

theregister.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 23 posts

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#11

Post by add-sub-mul-div »

estimator7292 wrote: post #3
add-sub-mul-div wrote: post #2

I don't get complaints about bloat and disk space is cheap but what I do hope is for some robust community distros that preserve the ability to have local accounts, if/when that stops being possible.

It's not about disk space, it's about what all that data is doing . Quite a lot of it is what we would traditionally call malware. Or shovelware if you want to be generous. Given Microsoft's recent history, it would be reasonable to assume that most of that bloat is full of software that is actively aiming to harm you, scam you, or spy on you. More than disk space, it burns CPU cycles and bandwidth that you are payin…

You don't need a special distro to turn those settings off. I read FUD all the time about those settings being reverted in updates but I turned it all off years ago and it's still off every time I check.

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#12

Post by johnklos »

mdaniel wrote: post #8

to avoid bazillions of clicking, the goods: https://github.com/ntdevlabs/tiny11builder (which, of course, has no license specified for the repo; maybe that's on purpose given the funding.yml)

The story is confusing in that they don't link to the actual project, which you can only get to by visiting the Github link, then going to the developer's projects page, then finding nano11.

I'm not sure, but I think nano11 is even more aggressive than tiny11builder's "tiny11coremaker.ps1":

https://github.com/ntdevlabs/nano11

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#13

Post by antisthenes »

Melatonic wrote: post #10

Anybody know how this compares to just running win 10 or 11 LTSC?

From the article:

"The resulting OS is not serviceable. This means you cannot add languages, drivers, or features, and you will not receive Windows Updates. It is intended only for testing, development, or embedded use in VMs where a minimal, static environment is required."

Depends what you mean by "just running". If I had to run a non-VM'd windows, I'd opt for a mostly-full version (10 IOT LTSC or 11 LTSC)

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#14

Post by canucker2016 »

johnklos wrote: post #12
mdaniel wrote: post #8

to avoid bazillions of clicking, the goods: https://github.com/ntdevlabs/tiny11builder (which, of course, has no license specified for the repo; maybe that's on purpose given the funding.yml)

The story is confusing in that they don't link to the actual project, which you can only get to by visiting the Github link, then going to the developer's projects page, then finding nano11. I'm not sure, but I think nano11 is even more aggressive than tiny11builder's "tiny11coremaker.ps1": https://github.com/ntdevlabs/nano11

FTA:

  "The resulting OS is not serviceable. This means you cannot add languages, drivers, or features, and you will not receive Windows Updates. It is intended only for testing, development, or embedded use in VMs where a minimal, static environment is required."

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#16

Post by dartharva »

add-sub-mul-div wrote: post #2

I don't get complaints about bloat and disk space is cheap but what I do hope is for some robust community distros that preserve the ability to have local accounts, if/when that stops being possible.

Windows "distros" can only be hacks, not projects, and they can't support security. Hell, it's highly likely many of them will "debloat" off most of Windows's security features by default.

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#18

Post by fuzzfactor »

Melatonic wrote: post #10

Anybody know how this compares to just running win 10 or 11 LTSC?

Last time I clean-installed Windows 10 32-bit, then manually uninstalled the things I didn't need (which is alot) and takes a little while, then converted to Compact Mode using Admin CMD, it came out less than 5GB on the C: volume.

That's Windows alone without installing anything else. Also with System Restore off, plus disk swap & hibernation disabled.

Nothing heroic like removing Edge, but Edge was definitely not updated nor was the OS online yet. I would expect bringing that image up to date now would more than double it.

Going further when you manually disable features and background services you know you don't need, it goes down below 1GB in memory too, and you can easily browse places like HN on a PC having only 2GB memory and no disk swap enabled.

Watch your step with such low memory though, you can't browse just anywhere and it gets a lot easier to step on all the proliferating newly placed "land-mines" if you're not careful :\

Re: Nano11 cuts Windows 11 down to size, grabbing just 2.8 GB of disk space

#20

Post by zparky »

antisthenes wrote: post #13
Melatonic wrote: post #10

Anybody know how this compares to just running win 10 or 11 LTSC?

From the article: "The resulting OS is not serviceable. This means you cannot add languages, drivers, or features, and you will not receive Windows Updates. It is intended only for testing, development, or embedded use in VMs where a minimal, static environment is required." Depends what you mean by "just running". If I had to run a non-VM'd windows, I'd opt for a mostly-full version (10 IOT LTSC or 11 LTSC)

The actual github repo has a 'regular' version: "The regular script, which removes a lot of bloat but keeps the system serviceable. You can add languages, updates, and features post-creation. This is the recommended script for regular use."

https://github.com/ntdevlabs/tiny11builder

Post reply on HN