Live data from Hacker News

No adblocker detected

maurycyz.com

111–120 of 388 posts

Re: No adblocker detected

#111
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

funny thought: i would speculate that the demographic intersection of web users and crack users has a higher utilization of adblock than all web users

... as well as all crack users.

idk those hardcore offline guys do A LOT of billboard vandalism

Re: No adblocker detected

#112
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if you could spend a few million on promoting adblockers to justify a short position on Google or Meta.

You'd have to be very careful not to run afoul of insider trading and/or market manipulation laws. Whether you would or not would depend on all the details and the jurisdiction.

Not in the US. There's no insider trading angle at all, and it's not fraudulent market manipulation to attempt to persuade consumers to cease supporting a business you're shorting as long as you're not lying about it.

Re: No adblocker detected

#113

I'm torn. I'm not a huge fan of ads and I don't have a lot of respect for the modern ad networks. However this culture of expecting websites to host the data then freeloading off it by blocking the tracking and ads is also a bit ugly. There is an unwritten social contract here. Websites are willing to host and organise a vast number of content because that'll attract an audience for ads. If there are too may freeload…

Ads are not the problem. It's the ad-tech surveillance and the malvertising. There are ways to show ads that are not a threat. When online services choose to become hostile, adblockers are the defense. I don't mind ads, I don't mind paying for services without ads, in fact I do for multiple services and news. I don't want surveillance ad-tech anywhere near my devices. It's the business decision of the company, that aides the worst enduring tech businesses with data collection and targeted scams and malware. So fuck'em. I'll steal gladly from overt assholes.

Re: No adblocker detected

#114
post #3

I wish browsers could just provide a way to disable javascript after page `onload`. Perhaps only enables js when user clicks something.

Tried to browse a while with NoScript addon. But barely any page loads, so you need to whitelist almost every page you visit, which defeats the purpose. I have been thinking about some kind of render proxy that runs all the JS for you somewhere else in a sandbox and sends you the screenshot or rendered HTML instead. Or maybe we could leverage an LLM to turn the Bloated JS garbage into the actual information you are l…

UMatrix has a better interface. The problem is the same, one has to find the minimum set of scripts that does not break the core functionality of the site. It's an ability that can be trained but it's the reason for I don't install it on the browsers of my friends. However I considered installing it, keeping it disabled and using it as a tool to show how much stuff each site loads from so many different sources. Many domain names are very telling even for the uninitiated.

Re: No adblocker detected

#115
post #59
post #36

I am extremely insulated from ads online and have been for about a decade. Once in a while I have to browse on a device that does not have an ad blocker or most of the times does not even let you install one. Seeing a website that is SEoptimised and heavily ad supported feels like walking into a crack den. That this is the normal experience for the vast majority of users is sad.

I really can't comprehend how aggressive ad blocking isn't the norm and at 90%+ at this point. Whenever someone just doesn't seem to care i'm concerned something is wrong with them. Youtube ad blocking was briefly not working for me recently and the volume of ads just while doing some chores which forced interrupting flow to go manually skip was astounding and enraging. It's like if I was at a quiet library and every…

The solution for me was to not watch YouTube anymore, no ad-blocker required.

Re: No adblocker detected

#116

I'm torn. I'm not a huge fan of ads and I don't have a lot of respect for the modern ad networks. However this culture of expecting websites to host the data then freeloading off it by blocking the tracking and ads is also a bit ugly. There is an unwritten social contract here. Websites are willing to host and organise a vast number of content because that'll attract an audience for ads. If there are too may freeload…

This is a fine social contract for the independent blogger just sharing their thoughts on the Internet and maybe hoping to get a few dollars for their server cost. Mega corporations that have been sucking up personal data for a couple decades now are not people. There is no social contract with them. They just sell your data. If you know what they are doing, know how to block it, and refuse to, you are complicit in m…

>This is a fine social contract for the independent blogger just sharing their thoughts on the Internet and maybe hoping to get a few dollars for their server cost.

The trouble is the ad-blockers will block their ads as well. Visit somewhere like John Gruber's Daring Fireball site which has the least offensive ad placement possible yet his adverts are still blocked.

Re: No adblocker detected

#118
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have said it years that adblocker is the best anti-virus these days.

I get miffed when corporations manage employee browsers and disable adblocker extensions.

When I've worked in the public sector IT dept, I've made sure that the installed browser is Firefox and uBlock Origin is set up.

Do your part.

Re: No adblocker detected

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get miffed when corporations manage employee browsers and disable adblocker extensions.

I don't understand why DNS ad blockers (Ad Guard, Pi-Hole, other) aren't frequently used across corporates. Especially given the regular-ish training on cybersecurity and related.

Don't ad blockers breach Terms of Service? I assume this is one reason that corps don't roll out adblockers

Re: No adblocker detected

#120
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really can't comprehend how aggressive ad blocking isn't the norm and at 90%+ at this point. Whenever someone just doesn't seem to care i'm concerned something is wrong with them. Youtube ad blocking was briefly not working for me recently and the volume of ads just while doing some chores which forced interrupting flow to go manually skip was astounding and enraging. It's like if I was at a quiet library and every…

I think people are just hopelessly used to their lives being saturated with ads. On TV, on the Internet, on radio, on billboards, at restaurants, at the airport, at the gas station, in stores, out of stores, almost every surface that could have an ad on it either does now or will one day. This saturation has been so complete and normalized that people are blind to it.

Indignant Fry: But not in dreams! No siree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPGgTy5YJ-g

Post reply on HN